this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
10 points (91.7% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

As an American, I support Ukraine droning inside Russia. Fuck up their power plants, oil production, and bases! I believe most Americans would agree that in war, this tactic is fair game.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

There have been no such calls for Ukraine to stop attacking Russia. The article is behind a paywall, and there are no corroborating stories from any credible news sites. According to the same article on yahoo news, the White House claimed its due to oil prices. The US gets its oil from Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Brazil. The headline has no merit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (12 children)

Power plants are not valid military targets though. No one should be attacking those and it's always wrong to do so.

Edit: I posted this comment and immediately went to bed. After waking up and looking at responses, I'm absolutely disgusted with people justifying and approving war crimes. Attacking civilian infrastructure like power plants is a WAR CRIME and that's why it's a huge deal that Russia has been attacking power plants. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Edit 2: alright, time for links since people seem unconvinced. Both the ICC and the UN consider the attacks by Russia on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure to be war crimes. If it's wrong for Russia to do, it's wrong for everyone to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Citation needed

Civilian infrastructure can in fact a valid target if it assist the military. Electricity generation is used to maintain many military systems, including telecommunications, logistics, lighting, radar systems, and all sorts of manufacturing capability that assists the military.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

So fucking what? Attacking civilian power infrastructure isn't the solution to fighting an enemy. Attack the military comms, logistics, lighting, radar, and manufacturing instead. Then everyone knows the attack is absolutely justified.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Power plants are not valid military targets though.

Yes apples are not oranges, so why are you trying to change the subject?
AFAIK there is not a single example of Ukraine attacking power plants in Russia.
An oil depot or refinery is NOT a powerplant. Russia has more than enough oil to serve their population, but maybe they can't serve the military 100% too, if Russia chooses to prioritize their illegal military invasion over their own population, that's a Russian problem. As long as Russia prioritize oil for their military, oil is a valid military target.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I'm not trying to change the subject. The OP tried to slip a war crime target in with valid military targets, and I wanted to set the record straight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, Russia already lost the right to say Ukraine shouldn't be hitting their power plants.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. If Russia started using VX gas, would it be acceptable for Ukraine to start using Sarin? Absolutely fucking not. There is never a legitimate excuse for a war crime.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

There is never a legitimate excuse for a war crime.

There's one actually. Survival.

If the situation gets to a point where your existence on the planet becomes problematic, you take the gloves off, you fight back with everything you can, especially if you're protecting those that you love.

Having said that, fuck war, and fuck war crimes. Wish the UN could resolve this crap before it gets to where we are now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Buddy, I can smell the straw from here. Ukraine isn't attacking Russia's critical infrastructure out of some need for retribution. If a grizzly bear attacks you, you hit that thing in any sensitive spot you can reach until it backs off. Otherwise you're dead. That's the situation Ukraine has been in from the start. They've been persistently outgunned and outmanned. The only way to get Russia to stop is to hit them where it hurts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I'm not making some kind of strawman argument. I'm correcting the OP, because attacking civilian infrastructure is a war crime. If Russia starts using chemical weapons, should Ukraine start too? If you have any sense of ethics, you'd say no.

Congratulations, you've successfully justified a war crime.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

~~Power plants are~~ Ukraine is not a valid military target though. No one should be attacking ~~those~~ it and it's always wrong to do so.

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well yes, but starting a war suddenly and without declaration isn't a war crime.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

~~Well yes, but~~ starting a war ~~suddenly and without declaration isn't~~ is a ~~war~~ crime.

FTFY as well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Look, I'm about as anti-war as they come. But in the capitalist neoliberal rules-based order, war happens constantly all over the world and the best we can do is enforce the provisions of the Geneva Convention. No good will come from equating war generally with war crimes right now. There will be a point where we can call war a crime against humanity, but the Overton window isn't there yet.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (11 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The geneva conventions and other treaties that established what we call the international conventions on warfare were not written by he UN, amd the UN has no jurisdiction on them. The geneva convention was held in 1864, about 80 years before the UN was formed.

The ICRC is the jurisdiction in “charge” of defining warcrimes.

In any case, warcrimes are contextual. Bombing a power plant in one instance may be a legitimate target in war, while in another case, where Russias goal was to cause civilians to freeze and suffer, may very well be. However, I am not a lawyer of the international criminal courts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Again, so fucking what if the UN isn't directly involved with charging and sentencing war crimes. The UN, the ICJ, and the ICC are all international organizations. When one makes a claim, it's highly likely that the others will follow suit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

It's morally wrong to do so. At the end of the day, like every single other war in the human history sadly , the right side is the winning one, be It bombing power plants, hospitals or houses.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why would the USA expect Ukraine to listen to them when Israel gets more aid & regularly lies to the USA with 0 repercussions?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Israel gets more aid

Israel probably hasn't gotten more aid in the last 2 years but overall they might have. Also, assuming this is even true, why would Ukraine listen to the US since they have abandoned support of Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Israel doesn’t get more aid. Unless you consider total aid since 1946 adjusted for inflation, then yes, but that wouldn’t make sense. Israel gets 3.3 billion a year. Since February 2022, the United States has allocated $113.4 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

'They don't get more money unless you count all the money'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Just because they have been supported by the US for a longer time.

I am not a fan of sending them anything, but that doesnt mean that they get more than ukraine this year and for the past 5-10 years, which is what you should compare.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And why shouldn't they?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

this is a fake story, there haven't been any "warnings".. it's pure propaganda being shoveled by the Russians..

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I hope Ukraine wins and takes a cut of Russian territory as compensation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

alas, i am afraid that even if ukraine is able to restore its territorial integrity, most of russian citizens won't understand that their government did something wrong. russia won't ever be humiliated like nazi germany, to force people to think what they did wrong.

i am afraid of newer russian revanshionism and i am afraid of what their post imperial phantom pains will make them do in the future.

my impression is that majority of the russian citizens feel pain regarding the 'lost lands' as they often put it, as a result of ussr collapse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Nazi Germany was “humiliated “ because they were occupied and force to learn of their crimes.

Russia cant must be allowed to get off Scot free for this shit. They need to be dismantled to nullify future harm, and forced to confront and acknowledge their crimes.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Yes, ukraine should lose some more soldiers to take a cut out of russia, to really show them. /s

Damn, this position at the sideline, rooting for our team, surley is comfortable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I like the Economist but maybe posting their articles here should be avoided since no one can obviously read them so everyone is just commenting about the headline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They are fighting in the fucking defensive war. What fucking logic is that? They should even cross the Russian border if needed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How about this: we’re allowed to tell them how to run their war as long as we supply them an uninterrupted pipeline of the shit they need to win it the way they’re telling us to.

Oh wait: we already tried that, except we not only didn’t even do it well, but also didn’t hold up our end of the bargain because of fucking fascist far-right politicians. So we kinda fucked that one up, didn’t we?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I hate that it took this long but the aid package cleared the house and is expected to clear the Senate. This just happened yesterday https://www.npr.org/2024/04/21/1246170238/ukraine-military-assistance-house-vote-mike-johnson-volodymr-zelenskyy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I know. All I’m saying is that any semblance of justification for exerting strategic oversight of their war is gone, considering the political fuckery we just pulled in the last 6 months that had very real and negative consequences for Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Oh yeah that's absolutely fair! I mainly threw this comment up because it's super fresh news so I was hoping to help spread it a bit.

load more comments
view more: next ›