Why didn’t you link one of those URLs, rather than whatever that epic news site is? The initial link you posted screams “this isn’t a legitimate source”.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because those urls are right on the page together. What exactly are you even complaining about here? Evidently you judge the legitimacy of a source based on page layout? 🤷

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Correct. I’m not going to waste my time reading articles on a website that has a bunch of telltale signs of having the end game of spreading disinformation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, a site linking to primary reputable sources has the end game of spreading disinformation. That's a totally reasonable statement a rational person would make.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, a 10 day old website with almost zero online fingerprints, built using the most generic layout that seems to just repost news from other sources… that doesn’t look shady at all, any reasonable person would assume it’s a totally reliable source of information.

You could have just posted the link to the actual sources. Digging your heels in and attacking me for calling that out isn’t making you look any better.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

So your complaints are that a site having legitimate information with primary sources is... new and has a bad layout. And you're accusing me of digging in my heels while making a clown of yourself here?