this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
11 points (61.7% liked)

Technology

34395 readers
453 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

So why did they send them to Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Because money, the answer is money

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Because it’s good to get rid of old equipment, at least from the military’s perspective. They get money for the old hardware and now can justify getting more new stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because having a tank is still better than not having a tank.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Really? Sounds like they just make easier targets

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To people that don't know what they're talking about, or are still refusing to acknowledge that Ukraine has more tanks than it started with and Russia has many, many, many, fewer, sure.

The discrepancy is so large that Ukraine has more tanks than Russia now. That they're effectively obsolete for their price is irrelevant, it's still better and requires more firepower to deal with than a couple dudes with rifles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What does that have to do with the tanks they have being blown up so easily?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol.

Vatnik cope has no intellectual limits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vatnik:

A perjoritive referring to a person that eagerly and without criticism repeats jingoistic propaganda claims of the Russian government.

In this context, someone pretending they don't understand that it's easier and cheaper to kill a person than a tank.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

So because I think we shouldn't send tanks to a warzone where its only going to be used to kill people and turn the operator into a much larger less maneuverable target that makes me some kind if Russian stooge?

Maybe its you that has been propagandized into thinking more tanks in a war zone is a good thing. Ive always been taught war is bad and it should not be prolonged. This is just prolonging it while getting more Ukrainians and Russians killed.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For the same reason they have sent billions of dollars there…to show their support. This isn’t the first country that the US has provided equipment for with little or no training…or without critical equipment onboard (i.e. specialized RADAR or electronics systems)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol nothing shows your support like tin cans that get blown up easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Once again, it depends on how their are used, deployed, and how the crews are trained. The Ukraine may be using them in ways that they were not designed, or using tactics that put the tank in a bad position.