this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
142 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

5054 readers
1813 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Note: fully aware of the irony of this gif, not to mention the wild contrast between the book and film. That being said, the movie is better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Just for the record the movie was definitely not the same as the book- Heinlein himself was libertarian, though I wouldn’t say it comes across in the book.

(The book setting is definitely fascist, or at the least authoritarian;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein himself was ~~libertarian~~ fascist.

FTFY.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Let me rephrase- heinlein identified himself as libertarian.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't the movie being a satire of the book a conscious choice of verhoeven's?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The movie was satire, but they bought the naming rights after establishing most of the movie script to avoid an copyright/IP infringement battle.

It was extremely similar, but it’s more accurate to say it was an entirely separate work than not.

Verhoeven meant it as a commentary on the US militarism rather than on heinlein.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That makes sense!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein himself was libertarian

didn't he change his views a couple times during his life?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I dunno, but his dirty old man era was wild

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

At best the movie seems too Poe's law for me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, I like most of what you said, but I can't in good conscience upvote someone who thinks the movie was better than the book. It's a fun movie, but, come on...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know which book/movie this is, so I'll just talk about Jurassic Park instead.

Timmy didn't do his part to help Dr Grant and Ellie Sattler hold the door from the raptor as Lex fiddled with "a unix system! I know this!"

Timmy just danced like he had to pee.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It's Starship Troopers. A sci-fi novel that was later adapted into a movie series. Notably the first movie is a parody of the hyper-militaristic, borderline fascist undertones of American style democracy. The book, on the other hand, was popular in the 1960s.