this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rich individuals in all countries must pay more to tackle the climate crisis, whether through taxes or charges on consumption, one of the architects of the Paris agreement has said.

There is a growing consensus on the need for some kind of global wealth tax, with Brazil, which will host the Cop climate summit next year, an enthusiastic supporter.

Meanwhile, poor countries are struggling to raise the estimated $1tn (£785bn) a year of external finance needed to help them cut emissions and cope with the impacts of the climate crisis.

Another proposal is for a frequent flyer levy, as the richest people tend to take far more flights – in any year about half of the people in the UK do not fly, for instance. Laurence Tubiana, the chief executive of the European Climate Foundation, said a levy could be targeted at business class and first class seats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it's worthwhile to remember that said rich nations only became rich by heavily exploiting the global south

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is prefer to phrase that differently. Most rich nations had the ability to build robust economies with steady growth without exploiting the global south... they just exploited the global south to get even richer.

It's not required that someone else suffer for a nation to get richer - and that's what makes it even more disappointing that that exploitation went forward.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Colonization - historically done by Britain, Portugal, Belgium, etc - did, in fact, exploit huge swathes of the south in order to get rich.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely, and that's awful and wrong.

My point was that wealth and standard of living increases don't require colonization. They could have progressed without needing to oppress native peoples.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My apologies. I read your response incorrectly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey no worries, as someone with ADHD you'd be amazed how often I accidentally imply exactly the opposite of what I state.. and my communication isn't always the clearest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I have ADHD too. I misunderstand all the time, and it's only getting worse with age.