Privacy

31182 readers

1812 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Chat surveillance law by the EU Parliament? (results.elections.europa.eu)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The results are showing up... Now we have to hope for the law to be declined... Already discussed about the chat control law of the EU, here : https://lemmy.ml/post/16469106

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They don't actually have to enforce that though. Rather, it's a neat trick: if you do use encrypted chats, well, you're purposefully doing something illegal! To hide information, no less! That surely means you have more to hide, and since you've already broken a law, let's investigate further!

To be clear: I'm not saying this is the intended effect. But it is a frighteningly possible one. Anyone who has reason to hide their communication (regime critical activists, opposition politicians, investigative journalists,...) either have to

accept that their communication will be scanned, making it trivial to spy on them and use that information (legally, no less!) to hinder/stop them, or
do something illegal, giving pretext for hindering/stopping them since they've now committed a crime

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the argument ?I've nothing to hide? isn't valid. Ask the people if then it's also OK if the Postman or anyone else read their private correspondence, or is looking over their shoulder while you are chatting with someone, above you are investigated by the authorities when you try to avoid it, it's exactly the same

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Oh, absolutely. In case it wasn't clear, I'm against chatcontrol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

They don't want to forbid the encryption only to backdoor to have a control on it. But that's almost impossible to backdoor all of them...