politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I think Vance's problem is that he has no defense for anyone's claims. You can claim ANYTHING about Vance, true or not, and people are like, "Yeah, I see it."
My mom had JD Vance as a student in Ohio. He kept 3 of his pet frogs in his underwear during the day and no one knew why.
See?
yea, i see it
did you enjoy the visualization?
no
AP can't prove he didn't keep pet frogs in his underwear.
And they were unable to find the frogs for comment.
They probably croaked at this point.
Have they checked in the couch?
His own party made racist jokes about his wife being Indian and this guy is like, "Yeah she's not white."
Wtf.
I would have taken any other answer, even the Will Smith slap. Jeez this fucking guy.
I think Vance’s problem is he’s super weird
Where'd he keep the rest of them?
In the couch to keep them moist.
You had to use the "m" word, huh? 😝
That makes total sense. I just hope he took them out when he had carnal relations with the settee.
No, he wanted to be able to claim he’d been in “orgies”.
How many pet frogs did he had?
Normal amount.
Well, enough to keep three in his underwear.
I heard they were tadpoles but came out frogs. So they were in there for a while.
I ate the onion on that statement, good on ya
I heard he liked the extra couch friction gained from the frog warts.
Just look at the guy y'know
In the underwear ? What ?
Technically, ladies underwear, but I don't judge.
The real comments are in the comments