this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
74 points (94.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You'd rather court bigots than progressives right after you got a huge demonstration that progressives are willing to vote for a compromise candidate.

Centrists were against Harris running and used the exact same "the bigots we love and respect won't like her" argument.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Want to court bigots over progressives? No I wouldn't personally.

Sadly, politics isn't based upon who you want to be besties with, it's based on what you can convince a certain percentage of the electorate to vote for.

If progressives made up a larger portion if the electorate than bigots, they'd a better seat at the table.

All political parties favor the old not because of some trite respect for the elderly BS, they favor the old because they fucking vote in massive numbers, while the young simply don't.

Politicians need to be elected to enact policy. You want your group to be a bigger hand in policy? Make your group a bigger part of the electorate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If progressives made up a larger portion if the electorate than bigots, they’d a better seat at the table.

Bigots don't vote for Democrats already. Courting them is a fool's errand.

All political parties favor the old not because of some trite respect for the elderly BS, they favor the old because they fucking vote in massive numbers, while the young simply don’t.

Young people are registering in droves right now because the party ignored the bigots. You just got a demonstration that addressing the concerns of young people works. Bigots were voting for Trump before and they're voting for Trump now. But since the party covets votes they're never going to get over votes they can get, we'll probably get some dopey Werther's Original enthusiast who thinks young people have it too easy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So if progressives have so many votes to offer and are the key to gaining political power, why don't progressives dictate who the president/congress is?

If they're such an easy key to power, why aren't politicians on both sides of the isle getting in line to get progressive or young votes to vote for them?

Are all politicians and all the staticians running their campaigns stupid????

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So if progressives have so many votes to offer and are the key to gaining political power, why don’t progressives dictate who the president/congress is?

Because donors do that.

If they’re such an easy key to power, why aren’t politicians on both sides of the isle getting in line to get progressive or young votes to vote for them?

Because donors don't want them to do that.

Are all politicians and all the staticians running their campaigns stupid???

gestures broadly at results