this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
129 points (92.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43340 readers
2067 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry if my question was weird.

And no, I am not some human's pet that just became intelligent and took over their Lemmy account. 😺

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They will probably be their own nation with their own laws on what is fair and what is not based on their values. I assume a new sentient specie will not have the same views and values as humans.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an interesting idea. If they always were intelligent, then yes, they'd probably have their own nation, or maybe they'd even be integrated with us in a society that accommodates for both of our form factors, but I'm sure there'd be terrible racism concerns because if we're this bad to people who look relatively similar to each other, then we'd be just terrible to a very different intelligent race.

But, if they suddenly became sentient through some sci Fi artifact or event, that'd be a whole other thing, and the process and debate of giving them rights and what to do about it would be complex and an ethical minefield on what to do or don't do. Probably planet of the apes. But with cats and dogs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They'll be persecuted and discriminated

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mostly agree with the comment, however, mammals are sentient. Our current laws are massively influenced by us not really understanding them and by ideas such as non-humans essentially being "living machines", created as servants to humanity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are already sentient but have not the intelligence of a average developed human. Pigs for example are sentient but their intelligence is like that of a 3 year old human.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I knew how to read some words at 3 years old

killing pigs feels wrong

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

No. There are already plenty examples of this. Thinking this will happen in the near future (100 years) is a fairytale.

As long as you don't have vocal cords capable of creating effective speech and you don't have appendages with which is possible to create and use tools you're fucked.

Examples? Plenty, let's go:

Pig: As intelligent as a 6 year old. What we do to them makes Auswitz looks like summer camp.

Dolphins: pushed into a bay and murdered by the hundreds. Thousands (millions?) die each year in the nets of our floating fishing factories. Their intellect is at least that of a 6 year old and most probably way more.

Whales: hunted to virtual extinction. Way more intelligent then a 6 year old.

Elephants: show clear sociological traits. Remembers stuff over a long time. Grieve over death. Hunted for their big ass teeth.

Apes: our close relatives. Hunted for meat. Most species of them easily operate at 10-12 year old level. Can use tools but can not create them. At the current path they're on in the wild (extinction). They will never reach the stone age.

We rule. Harshly.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't forget our corvid friends. Crows and ravens are very good at problem solving and abstract thinking.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Octopuses too. Excellent problem solving, retaining long-term and short-term memory, recognizing how mirror works and so forth.

But they're delicious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely depraved.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

that may exacerbate things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Whoa, elephants have ass teeth?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have our place on the planet purely by right of conquest.

It's fundamentally immoral what we do to animals but people just ignore it, accept it as a necessary evil, or somehow block the empathy from their brain applying to animals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

or somehow block the empathy from their brain applying to animals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance#Meat-eating

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

They should, but they wouldn’t.

We can’t even get fair treatment for humans.

Not to mention, people can’t even see past cultural veils… pigs are smarter than dogs, and people who would never eat a dog have no second thoughts eating pigs and mocking vegetarians/vegans.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Should they? Yes.

Would they? Ahhhahahaha

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Rights have nothing to do with intelligence, otherwise people like Trump or Andrew Tate would have ~0 rights.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Yes, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, intelligence is intelligence. There's nothing about the rest of the body that the brain is encased in that makes one more or less deserving of rights.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If a human has the intelligence of a dog, they should have the same rights as a dog?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While not technically, practically they do yes. If someone has developmental issues they generally aren't afforded the same rights as the average adult human.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they became more intelligent than us, would they pick up our poo?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They would probably train us to poo in a place where our poo didn't need to be picked and could just be disposed off easilly, maybe by using running water and a system of pipes serving a large geographical area with pet-human cages, which would take the water carrying such substances to a central place were it could be treated or disposed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Cats definitely wouldn't

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Humans go out of their way to mistreat and abuse other humans. If cats and dogs became as intelligent as humans, some dickhead leader of a leading religious cults would label them satan/ abomination/ equivalent b.s. and call to have them exterminated. and/or capitalists would lobby to deny them rights and pass laws to profit off them & their labour.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they're as smart, communicatable and capable of social responsibilities, then yes. There are some species that may be "differently" smart as humans, but lack a common lanuage and can't take on shared social responsibilities, so giving them rights is difficult to say the least.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

If they were smart they'd keep their mouths shut

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, absolutely they should have rights.

In some countries (like France, iirc), chimps are recognized as having civil rights. They don’t have identical rights to humans of course. They don’t have the same rights as a human, but they are recognized as having rights as individuals.

Although the US hasn’t recognized that, yet, it has effectively banned chimpanzee research. You basically cannot get funded for chimpanzee research unless you a) demonstrate they are necessary for the research and b) you pass a review board similar to a human subjects review board who are charged with maintaining ethical research standards. I don’t do primate research, so I’m not sure of all of the details, but with human subjects boards you have to show that not only does your research. avoid harming humans, the subjects themselves must benefit from your work, if it is health related. When the new rules were passed, most research chimps were retired to preserves

So if there was a l other animal with fully human intelligence, there’s legal precedent to recognize that they have inherent dignity and rights.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Parts of the US struggle to offer an adequate level of rights to its human residents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a post the other day about whether anyone else has noticed a significant decline in the reading comprehension of the general population, even on sites that skew towards the nerdy like Lemmy, and here we are, with a significant number of top comments that don't know what "should" means.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they know what it means, but they just wanna complain about quasi-related stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If that was the case you would assume they would lead with "Should, but won't because cynicism." And several do, because they understand the assignment!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And no, I am not some human’s pet that just became intelligent and took over their Lemmy account. 😺

If one of my cats took over my Lemmy account, you'd know it for sure. One of them would be always silent, lurking; the other would be spamming stupid shit about yoghurt, towels and boxes, in German.

If cats and dogs became as intelligent as humans, should they have the same rights as humans under law?

Under the moral premise that intelligent beings should get similar rights, yes. Thankfully people don't usually follow this premise - otherwise mentally disabled people would suffer even more.

Instead I think that most people follow some sort of "naive Realpolitik" - we're humans and we defend human interests, that's it. In this case cats/dogs would likely get rights above most other animals (as allied species), but still lower than our own.

I'm not sure on what I would defend in this case.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, cats are pretty much little space wizards and they know damn well they'll have to start finding odd cat jobs and paying rent if we catch on to them being more intelligent than us. They got it figured out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Why not? Some cultures such as the Greeks already did this for dolphins because of the idea dolphins have human level intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think animals should have more rights already. It'd be nice if they could talk or something to help people realize they're actually living things worthy of empathy.

But to your point, cats and dogs are already among the better-treated animals in large parts of the world.

Compared to animals who get farmed (especially factory farmed), or get the death sentence label of a pest or invasive species.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mostly agree with you, but protections aren't the same thing as rights. Protections are a one way street, rights are a two way street.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Intelligence is a term too vague to be of use for the comparison of species. If you were tasked with finding the next waterhole in an arid landscape you might not be found very intelligent compared with a whole range of other species. Or if the proof of intelligence was to manage a planet in a sustainable way.

Rights are difficult. Basically we have, gradually, invaded a lot of spaces once occupied by other species, and keep invading more. Giving rights to dogs, cats, whales or horses is an invader giving rights to the invaded. On the other hand, as we keep turning the temperature of the planet up, we worsen the conditions for ourselves and some bug, fungus, microbe or lizard might prove to be the next big thing after mammals had their chance?

load more comments
view more: next ›