this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
208 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Glad it’s 11, wish it was more.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Same. But that's out of 200 total so 5.5%. As of 2022 a poll concluded that approximately 7.1% of adult Americans identified as LGBT (source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/389792/lgbt-identification-ticks-up.aspx)

When looking at it that way it's actually a pretty impressive accomplishment. Yes it's not exactly in-line with the population but that would be damn near impossible to do given the various demographics across the entire US.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

It shouldn’t be compared to national statistics, but the distribution of the source pool.

In 2021, the NALP Survey of 849 law offices across the country found that 3,653 lawyers (3.7%) identified as LGBTQ.

He’s seated well above the percent of LGBTQ+ attorneys available for him to choose from.

https://www.2civility.org/aba-profile-of-the-legal-profession-heres-what-the-legal-profession-looks-like-in-2022/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I think there should be more than a representative number of federal judges who are queer. Queer people are the most at risk from the law, so they should have the biggest say in the law. Same for racial minorities, women, and disabled people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yes. But the overall percentage isn’t there I’m sure. Patience I know. 6 months left to course correct the previous “regime”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yet, progressives are contemplating not voting because Biden is "not doing enough." Guess they'd rather see what Trump has in store for them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Am so gladly to have someone like eloise wilbert on Instagram, who help me boasts my profits to the next level.. And I gained such money from my investment all thanks to ELOISE WILBERT ON INSTAGRAM 💯💯💯💯

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

throwing a few scraps out to the desperate starved masses does not make Biden an LGBTQ advocate making history

Biden says his positions are deeply influenced by Catholic social teaching.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden

Biden is not progressive he a right leaning religious conservative with a prosecutor as a vice president and they have spent their careers putting citizens in their proper places

Being progressive and making history would be the democrats upping the minimum wage to $20 or more, protecting women's rights, protecting voting rights, setting up a national healthcare system, getting the police under control

Everything that the Democrats already promise every election just to get elected

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Perfect is the enemy of good. Are you a member of the LGBTQ community?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

And good is way better than Trump/Republican/conservative's bad.

I get it Americans, Biden sucks but Trump is horrific, no contest.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes and do not expect perfect leaders but at least have them align more with what the citizens want

remember going to the mall when was younger with a same sex partner and getting the nasty looks and comments when we would hold hands or show any affection especially from the older conservative looking types

the world does not seem much different than back then some ways less progressive now if that is even possible

and it should be fucking different now know not the only one

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I am also really sick of hearing this crap from Biden supporters. “Oh, so you’re just going to let Trump win?” MF my life has gotten worse under Biden because Democrats didn’t do anything when they held the Senate, House, and Presidency all at the same time.

So now my state’s Republicans have proceeded to take away rights of queer folks and women with almost no resistance. Now when Republicans pushed through a school voucher program, tons of resistance. Emails, organizing, etc. But the NEA has money, and queer folks don’t.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As someone that is gay, fuck Biden. Our rights are no more protected under a Democrat as they are under a Republican. I'm not talking bullshit social shit like marriage or adoption. Until they address things like wages, housing, education, and healthcare we have no rights. Democrats don't care what bathroom a trans person uses and also don't care if they are living on the streets doing it.

Refusal to address wages, housing, healthcare and education is social murder and violence.

The motherfuckers also gave our marriages to the states where we would have fewer rights.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is an asshole statement.

I am a member of the queer community, and this is the kind of garbage that distances me even more from Biden.

FWIW, I did vote for Biden, and it was the first time I had voted for a non-third party for president, but I won’t be voting for him again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

What’s it called when people do this?

Trying to shut down reasonable voices by attacking and then saying that type of comment is going to affect how they vote ?

This feels fake as hell and I see it constantly now.

Am I the only one who thinks statements like this are just attempts at keeping reasonable people from speaking up?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Smart. If you check historical presidential races, all of them had a third party very close to winning, so that's a good thing to use your vote on. You'll get 'em this year. And even if you don't, the consequences are fine, not as if the only other option is an insurrectionist promising to be a dictator and do whatever the oil billionaires ask. Not as if Repubs have been appointing treasonous theocrats to SCOTUS or anything that would hurt vulnerable groups.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Yup, I’ve always voted third party because they’ve always had a chance at winning. Because perfect is the enemy of good.