this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Privacy

31182 readers
1812 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
0
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hello, making this post to get some honest, and technical opinions about GrapheneOS. Please do not be bother by this question. No drama here pls ๐Ÿ™. I've heard that there is some of the google code into the "sandbox" feature. Say your opinion below! ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well it's open source android, if the code is bad, it's jettisoned. While I cannot stand Google, not every line of code they write is trash.

The sandbox is good and you do not need to install Play if you do not want to. I use f droid where possible.

I want Linux Mobile but it is not ready yet. In the mean time, this is the best we have.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is full of proprietary software. I wouldn't call it that open.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You really have 0 understanding on how all this works ๐Ÿ˜ญ

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if you have a pixel theres absolutely no reason why you shouldnt use it.

if you dont i dont think its worth to buy one just for graphene

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There a lot of ethical reasons to not use it. Also the community tends to be a bit toxic.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate on the ethical part, please?

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

They encourage proprietary software and locked down systems. For instance, they use Google play services instead of microG and they promote the play store. I personally think that F-droid apps are much better from both an software freedom perspective and a privacy perspective. I'm not against people installing proprietary apps as I realize sometimes that is unavoidable but they could at least encourage the use of Foss. Graphene could simply have both F-droid and Aurora store by default and on setup explain the difference. They could even allow the install of Play services instead. However, they don't even really try. They focus on security which at the end of the day is subjective.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

I don't trust the google kernel when it comes to privacy or security. You think with how many people use Android and with how bad actors Google are they wouldn't put a backdoor somewhere?

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Everything on Android is half-assed but that's not Graphene's fault.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Ask me when the NSA knocks at your door, what I think about it? I think it's a big honeypot.

Think about it, if you were the NSA or the CIA would you push a privacy oriented OS? Honeypot vibes get stronger

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

It's a middleground between a regular stock spyware ROM and a degoogled one with pretty good security thanks to lockable bootloader.

P. S. I can hear the drama coming unfortunately. This ROM's devs have haters.