this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Knowing that Project 2025 is extreme is knowing SOMETHING about it, which is also not nothing.

Checkmate, Trump.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A raging narcissist doesn't know about or like a plan that installs 20,000 people loyal to him and him alone to allow him to do what he wants regardless of the constitution?

I don't think this guy is being honest with us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm going to be that guy that doesn't read the article, but how would someone know something is seriously extreme if he knows nothing of it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Even assuming he’s clean (HA!), what kind of leader keeps surrounding himself with people that just happen to go to jail or get put under criminal investigations constantly?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The obvious play here, if the Dems actually gave a shit about winning the election, is to jump on this not as a lie, but asking why Trump would forget about working with Project 2025 despite there being clear proof, is his mind going? That leaves his only response being "no, I didn't forget, I was deliberately lying" which digs a deeper hole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I like that plan. Good grief, I hope some speechwriters for Dems are reading things like Lemmy...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

His brain does not function, that's the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Convicted felon Donald Project 2025 Trump attempts to distance himself from Project 2025.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I heard he raped Project 2025 when it was just an email chain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Police officer who spoken at several Dog Killers of America events, has shot multiple dogs, and has worked closely with many people involved in Project Kill Dogs claims to know nothing about plan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He doesn't want the backlash.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

He doesn’t want to take responsibility for any of his actions, even the ones he hasn’t taken yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Trump has tried to distance himself from Project 2025, but it is clear that he supports and is supported[1] by Project 2025’s many authors[2] including his own press secretary and many members of his cabinet. He has, for example, called Project 2025 “our agenda”[4] and is personally mentioned hundreds of times in the document. By the Heritage Foundation’s own count, Trump already implemented a majority of their recommendations during his last term [3] and 81% of Project 2025’s authors held official appointments in his administration[5].

  1. https://democrats.org/news/project-2025-is-undeniably-a-trump-driven-operation/

2 https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-project-2025-truth-social-rcna160774

  1. https://www.heritage.org/impact/trump-administration-embraces-heritage-foundation-policy-recommendations

  2. https://www.heritage.org/impact/heritage-analysis-trump-administrations-first-year-draws-high-profile-attention

  3. https://popular.info/p/what-trump-doesnt-want-you-to-know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Does he also claim he "doesn't know her" when it comes to Roger Stone, Bannon, Steve Miller, Gorka, etc...?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Trump wouldn't lie to us, would he?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

It seems like it is just a new PR name for what the status quo has been trying to do for decades^[1].

If I understand the commentary from sources correctly^[2].

Sources:

  1. https://lemmy.world/post/17333868
  2. https://lemmy.world/post/17479789

“Like some on the right, severe right, came up with this Project 25, I don’t even know, some of them I know who they are, but they’re very, very conservative,” Trump said. “They’re sort of the opposite of the radical left.”

“You have the radical left and the radical right and they come up — I don’t know what the hell it is, it’s Project 25,” he continued. “‘He’s involved in project — and then they read some of the things and they are extreme, they’re seriously extreme.

“But I don’t know anything about it, I don’t want to know anything about it.”

Project 2025 is led by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, and more than a dozen former Trump administration officials.

The document includes plans to expand his executive authority, replace civil servants with loyalists, crush abortion rights, attack civil rights for LGBTQ+ people and impose an anti-immigrant agenda, among other policies.

He also claims the plan is “extreme,” but the document mirrors several policies the former president himself has endorsed.

“Project 2025 will not be ‘stopped’ by an unserious, mistake-riddled press release or a task force of House Democrats lacking a basic understanding of federal governance,” Roberts said in a statement.