this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
17 points (90.5% liked)

News

22528 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Marc van der Chijs said, "I don’t think Trump’s speech will gain him a lot of new voters among Bitcoiners."

"The other way around, many will now see him for what he really is," he added. "It was my first time watching him speak live. He sounds like a low IQ conman to me, I wouldn’t believe anything he tells me."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Huh.
Crypto is a neat idea. Good crypto is not a bad thing.
But crypto is a huge energy sink, tho. For no tangible product.

Crypto also is a huge part of scams, black market, money laundering, and predatory gambling. Never mind the various pump&dump scams, insider trading, fraud, thefts etc.
For reference, the majority of Coffiezillas YouTube channel of him exposing, investigating and explaining these things from influencers to FTX, moonshot, roobet and loads more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

nice to have all the rotten eggs in one basket

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Will they donate in crypto or real money?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If you're in these comments saying Bitcoin is a waste of energy resources, come prepared with the amount of energy traditional finance uses. How many banks have big empty buildings in downtown that keep their lights on all night? Security trucks to transport cash, etc.

What the Fediverse has done for social media, Bitcoin does for money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bitcoin has done jack shit.

Move bitcoin from proof-of-work, then start building an argument.

Banks do a hell lot more than just basic transactions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PoW is necessary to financially disincentivize attacks on the network.

Programmable money can achieve everything a bank does and more. Imagine automations that have their own wallets and can pay people (or other bots) to do things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?

How in the hell does PoW better disincentivize attacks than PoS?

And programmable anything is a big mistake. As a software developer, I want LESS programmable things, specially in life-threatening scenarios.

Remove humans from equation, wonder later why there's nobody do blame for the catastrophy.

And fuck every system that enables such state.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Attacking a PoW system costs more than a bad actor would receive in reward for attacking the system.

There's good book I can recommend that you might enjoy as a programmer if you want to learn more about this: Mastering Bitcoin by Andreas Antonopolis. He is a Greek CS nerd who got into it during the Greek financial crisis and explains this all very well.

It's strange to me to be a professional programmer and have no interest in highly secure programmable money and distributed systems for consensus, but you do you. I am not here to change your mind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because if you know one thing about software as a developer, it's that it's never secure, not even now.

I have no desire to automate everything and let bad actor disrupt the global system of anything.

Remember crowdstrike?

Also, PoWs have been split in the past thanks to cloud, what are you talking about.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Never secure? Maybe you and I have a different definition of secure. Billions are currently secured in BTC, and have been for years.

Crowdstrike is an argument against your point - single point of failure and too much power in one actor.

Please send me the example you mentioned about Bitcoin's PoW being "split by cloud" - not sure what that means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, we obviously have different definition of security, as you imagine at being 'outside the traditional banks', not 'guaranteed to be at your disposal and accepted by the rest of the world'.

Bitcoin is just one crypto, which is still being developed, and if you think CrowdStrike is an argument against thousands of banks versus one git repo, I have a bridge to sell to you.

It gets really exhausting talking to people with minimum technical knowledge at best about this stuff. 51% attacks have been done in the past, acting like it's not possible is just plain stupid.

PoW is a huge energy black hole with nothing to show for it.

Bitcoin by itself has done very little for the general public, its biggest achievement was spawning other coins, which was the idea from the start. BTC should have died a decade ago.

Crypto is and should remain a niche past time for some techical folk, once big money goes in, it will kill the retail (non-business) users. Big players will make (or already made) PoW and PoS irrelevant for basic users. At least stop them from killing the planet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One doesn't justify the other

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

BTC can use the same amount of energy it does now and process every transaction that tradfi does. Aka it's more efficient than the legacy system it will replace