coffee_with_cream

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think the phrase originates from red pill "culture" so you might be unintentionally correct

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Surprisingly balanced and civil discussions in these comments. Super proud to be here ๐Ÿ’ช this would not happen elsewhere

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

You probably want 48gb of vram or more to run the good stuff. I recommend renting GPU time instead of using your own hardware, via AWS or other vendors - runpod.io is pretty good.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Uncensored models are so much better, too. chatGPT is like one of those plastic children's toy hammers vs real models are titanium hammers

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Never secure? Maybe you and I have a different definition of secure. Billions are currently secured in BTC, and have been for years.

Crowdstrike is an argument against your point - single point of failure and too much power in one actor.

Please send me the example you mentioned about Bitcoin's PoW being "split by cloud" - not sure what that means.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Attacking a PoW system costs more than a bad actor would receive in reward for attacking the system.

There's good book I can recommend that you might enjoy as a programmer if you want to learn more about this: Mastering Bitcoin by Andreas Antonopolis. He is a Greek CS nerd who got into it during the Greek financial crisis and explains this all very well.

It's strange to me to be a professional programmer and have no interest in highly secure programmable money and distributed systems for consensus, but you do you. I am not here to change your mind.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

PoW is necessary to financially disincentivize attacks on the network.

Programmable money can achieve everything a bank does and more. Imagine automations that have their own wallets and can pay people (or other bots) to do things.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I haven't laughed this hard in a while, thank you, I needed this โค๏ธ

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

BTC can use the same amount of energy it does now and process every transaction that tradfi does. Aka it's more efficient than the legacy system it will replace

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

If you're in these comments saying Bitcoin is a waste of energy resources, come prepared with the amount of energy traditional finance uses. How many banks have big empty buildings in downtown that keep their lights on all night? Security trucks to transport cash, etc.

What the Fediverse has done for social media, Bitcoin does for money.

 

I have a bunch of old bare hard drives with tons of content sitting on them, and I was thinking about setting up a new NAS / piracy Linux box, as a backend for Plex or similar.

I want to be able to index my old content and automatically grab new episodes of TV shows and popular movies, with minimal fussing around after initial setup. I am capable with technology, so happy to spend time getting it set up in the first place.

Where should I start?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Uploading cock pics and learning about socialism

view more: next โ€บ