this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Any time someone says anyone is a DEI hire, call them what they are. A racist. Especially someone like her. She was elected by millions of people for each of her three major positions in life.

Attorney General of California

Senator of California

Vice-president of the United States.

Fuck right off assholes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Anytime someone says anyone is a DEI hire

Some people are DEI hires though, don't overreact.

Someone using it as a slur against the most competent candidate is being racist. But used for anyone elevated for diversity reasons it's perfectly valid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I like that. I usually just say "Oh, like all those old money assholes out there, like Trump, who were given their positions and fortunes by their parents?"

To quote Robin Williams, "Some are born great, some achieve greatness, some get it as a graduation gift!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The repubtards like using DEI - it's like having a new N-bomb that's not limited to just one ethnicity that they hate. They've mostly moved on from 'woke,' probably because it didn't mean enough to really be useful as a racist dog whistle, being more generally hateful towards everyone they hate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Also people started looking up what "woke" actually meant and getting woke as a result

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

DEI is better for them because it hits two birds with one stone: their hatred of people darker than printer paper in the workplace, and their belief that ‘promoting people beyond their means’ (that is, people of color getting higher positions) destroys the very fabric of society.

The Alt-Right Playbook goes into it in more detail, but basically these numbskulls think that the proper way for we humans to live is in a rigid hierarchical society, with the Great And Wise Leaders at the top, and everyone on each tier of the pyramid ‘sticking to their lane’ and not trying to ‘rise above their station’.

Of course, they’ve decided that old white guys are the ones who should always be on the top of the pyramid, and enjoy all the benefits of society without owing anyone anything.

It’s why they love racist rhetoric; they’re always looking for some justification for them being higher up on the pyramid—which means, by default, more people need to be below them. With the magic of racism, they don’t need accomplishments or even money to achieve higher levels! Skin color alone bumps them up the ranks.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

As somebody whose skin color is best described as printer paper, this felt weirdly insulting.