this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

38707 readers
677 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Woohoo! We internal now! No more FQDN collisions!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would have been nice if they came up with something shorter like .lan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, that's LAN - I thought you'd put ian and I was trying to get the joke. Stupid sans-serif fonts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry. I chose .local and I'm sticking to it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still haven't heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mainly conflicts with mDNS. However it's shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

That I agree with. Microsoft drafted the recommendation to use it for local networks, and Apple ignored it or co-opted it for mDNS.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do I care what ICANN says I can do on my own network? It's my network, I do what I want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Try using .com for your internal network and watch the problems arise. Their choice to reserve .internal helps people avoid fqdn collisions.

See also https://traintocode.com/stop-using-test-dot-com/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well as long as the TLD isn't used by anyone it should work internally regardless of what ICANN says, especially if I add it to etc/hosts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

German router and network products company AVM learned the hard way that this is a bad idea. They use fritz.box for their router interface page and it was great until tld .box became publicly available and somebody registered fritz.box.

Having a reserved local/internal only tld is really great to prevent such issues.