ipkpjersi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago

There are dozens of us!

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We would need all peasants doing it at once. One peasant doing it just means you get your head cut off, which unfortunately doesn't help.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

When I was younger, I used to think politics didn't matter and that all politicians are crooks. Now I know that all politicians are crooks AND politics matters and has real-world consequences.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is just not true.

Just because you don't like LLMs doesn't mean that they have no purpose. If they were really entirely useless and served no purpose and never did anything, they would not be the talk of the town and OpenAI would not be a multi-billion dollar company. If they were useless, nobody would use them, but people absolutely do use them.

I literally use ChatGPT daily to automate writing code for me and it honestly does a good job. I literally used it to write an entire Laravel project called ArigatouAnimeTracker, over 600 commits including documentation all written using ChatGPT, and tbh my project is awesome. It easily would have taken me 5x as long to write it without ChatGPT and tbh it might not have ended up existing without ChatGPT because of how long it would have taken to write without LLMs doing the heavy lifting.

Sure, you have to verify the output, but you know what? That's going to be the case for any code that is written regardless, code review is essential and completely normal and existed long before LLMs did. That doesn't mean that LLMs don't have a purpose, or that nobody actually uses them. People do use them, it's a multi-billion dollar industry for a reason and people are going to continue to use them, even if you say they have no redeeming qualities. There are definitely ethical concerns about LLMs, but to say they have no redeeming qualities is just not correct.

Regardless, anything I say about AI/LLMs that isn’t that it’s terrible and useless and nobody should/would ever use it is going to be met with criticism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But the thing is condoms ARE 98% effective, and yet people still use them every single day.

Nothing is perfect, humans, AI/LLMs, etc, no matter what, absolutely nothing is.

Regardless, anything I say about AI/LLMs that isn't that it's terrible and useless and nobody should/would ever use it is going to be met with criticism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I disagree with that view on them, and I think the fact that they fail is actually a good thing in terms of preventing damage to humanity.

If they are able to perfectly do all kinds of jobs without ever making mistakes and being better at it than any humans, that would be infinitely more damaging than having them make mistakes meaning their use is limited to having to have their output carefully reviewed yet still used when it is helpful and appropriate.

Regardless, anything I say about AI/LLMs that isn't that it's terrible and useless and nobody should/would ever use it is going to be met with criticism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Calling "AI" (I know it's not true AI but rather an LLM) useless is very dismissive and just not true at all.

I wrote ArigatouAnimeTracker nearly entirely using ChatGPT including the description, nearly all 600 commits entirely from ChatGPT generated code. It is very far from useless and I feel much more comfortable with my dev job knowing I am willing to and able to leverage these newer technologies. They are only going to get better and what they are already capable of is impressive. If I didn't use an LLM it would have easily taken me 5x as long to write that project.

Regardless, anything I say about AI/LLMs that isn't that it's terrible and useless and nobody should/would ever use it is going to be met with criticism.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Though I'm sure the women wouldn't want to sit near a man who wants to sit with women lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you 1500 calories, then exercise and burn 500 calories, yes you would need to eat another 500 calories to reach 1500 calories.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Woohoo! We internal now! No more FQDN collisions!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That game looks awesome, I should check it out some time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not necessarily true, some people just don't tolerate fiber well. It doesn't mean that they absolutely definitely have something medically wrong, for some people it just causes bloating no matter what.

view more: next ›