this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
60 points (98.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5053 readers
458 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/875222

We've known for a long time that trees can keep the built environment cooler, but with heat waves and deaths spiking worldwide, it has become an urgent need in many areas.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

News for the US of A and China. Reality for basically all European countries. Get on with the times.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you trying to say that Europe has already implemented this idea? Because that's not what the article indicates.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it's a common design pattern in warmer European countries.

Although I rarely see (in Paris) the entire street covered by trees, usually at least pedestrian parts are in the leaf shade. In my smaller hometown (10km from Paris' edge) I'd guess we have 50/50 for entire coverage/partial

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This study showed Paris with a dismal 9% canopy coverage, which was one of the lowest measured: https://senseable.mit.edu/treepedia

Perhaps if the trees are strategically located where they are needed it may have a bigger impact? But what I've read is that the benefits really kick in when you reach about 30-40% coverage which is substantially higher than virtually all cities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They have and it feels so nice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Plus you know, they're just nice to look at and good for mental well-being too!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never understood why there isn't a movement to go around to every piece of open municipal land that isn't used for anything much (except to burn gas to cut the grass every summer) and plant tree seedlings on it.

Yes I hear "town elders" saying blah-blah-blah traffic safety - maintenance - etc. but ffs, just get on and do it, and figure out the few problems as they arise. It does not need years of committee study!

There are even several companies who will fly in 100s per minute from a drone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of people just don’t like the fact that trees make their lives difficult in minor ways. Sometimes the political opposition can be very hard to overcome. Also, I live in a semi-arid climate and most trees won’t survive without some level of care. So that becomes an issue of who will water, weed, mulch, prune, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago