this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023

1 points (60.0% liked)

World News

32048 readers

1160 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

UFO hearings: whistleblower David Grusch says ‘non-human biologics’ found at alleged crash sites – as it happened (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My interpretation is that it's mostly half-truths.

Do I think governments and militaries around the world have plans for such scenarios? Like retrieving UFOs? Yes, this seems reasonable. Do I think they have run exercises and tested those scenarios for real? Probably, yes. Most likely successfully so. Do I believe that someone with a lot of hearsay could interpret those things as "holy shit, they actually found something"? Yes, yes I do.

Is any of this proof? Nope. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any decent military is going have crash retrieval teams. It’s called CSAR - combat search and rescue. If a Russian or Chinese jet crashes somewhere neutral, we are going to race to get there. If it’s our own F-35, we will get there even faster and probably fight anyone who tries to get there first. I imagine you would do this for any interesting craft that crashes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and when something crashes in the ocean it might be full off sea weed errr, I mean non-human biologics. And if equipment from foreign nations were recovered of course they'd get reverse engineered.

Knowing how secretive militaries tend to be about their missions … of course the whistleblower gets stonewalled when trying to inquire about it.

I haven't seen a single claim that couldn't be explained with something mundane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

show me proof. the talking is fine but I need evidence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Neil deGrasse Tyson said if you get taken up to a UFO, you should steal something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thats probably why I never get abducted, I'm def the type to steal some shit from people who kidnap me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what do you have to lose? they probably already took your dignity during the experiments. might as well take something back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Just clench at the right moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

How is this guy a "whistle blower" if he's never seen any actual evidence? So dumb.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The aliens look just like us but are attracted to positions of power and clearly have no idea how their job works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Non-human, so it could be a dog or a monkey?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or a monkey-dog!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Behold the esquilax! A dog with the head or a rabbit and the body of a rabbit!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not only clickbait, but also:

Updated 21h ago

There's nothing new to discuss.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Quite vague. Nonhuman biologics can be anything. Grass, bacteria, mold, cats...

Noneartly biologics would be more interesting.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Non-human biologics? Like plants? Or maybe bugs? Or how about a weasel?

[+] [email protected] -9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a few interpretations if this based on my limited understanding if it.

I think the oversite committee has to hear him out. Ignoring a complaint from multiple members of military about potential misappropriation of funding would be egregious on their part. So they are listening to everything and trying to be professional about it.

Now the cynic in me believes this is actually a genius way to push pulp. If this guy writes a book (assuming he hasn't already) he's just given himself enormous credibility and advertising at little to no cost. Loud enough to be heard but vague enough that he can't be disproven or take on any accountability.

But the conspiracy theorist in me just sees this as an attempt to discredit and humiliate this and other sub committee's. Ammo that can be used to try and shut it down or prevent them from more serious work.

Though I'm a Candain and only getting bits and pieces of this story so I'm probably way off base here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i watched the thing. multiple times they ask him questions that he responds with a willingness to answer in a closed session, especially about individuals and companies tied to this dark funding shit