this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
213 points (88.2% liked)

World News

32048 readers
1160 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago

The full truth about what happened on or after 7 October could be established by an independent investigation, something Israel is unlikely to ever permit.

Yeah maybe they shouldn't have kicked out Human Rights Watch. Then we might actually know what happened.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Respectfully, I don't know if, er, electronicintifada.net is exactly a good source for unbiased news on this topic. I wonder what the article says...

Israeli propaganda officials are reportedly upset...

It truly is a work of science to take "some government propaganda officials are reportedly upset" and somehow turn that into "The entire state of Israel is FURIOUS...".

Almost as if the headline was engineered to reinforce pre-existing biases or something.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If the state's propaganda mouthpieces are upset it isn't unreasonable to say the state, itself, is upset.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

Israel's clamped down on more legitimate sources and is even trying to kick of Al Jazeera (which has consistently led in terms of accuracy in journalism).

American news isn't a good source for unbiased news either, but people still post it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They arrived at the kibbutz and kidnapped us, taking us to surrounding fields,” Lifshitz recalled. “The young men beat me and hurt me and took my watch and jewelry. They were riding motorbikes and took us to the entrance of a tunnel.”

Seems like if it were propaganda they would have omitted that. Seems legit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

It's difficult to square that with posting a headline that only mentions "humane treatment".

I'm sure you're smart enough to know that media bias can be expressed in a wide variety of ways. Hell, a lot of Fox News' reporting is itself perfectly fine, but then it'll be editorialized into painting an extremely sensational picture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Been following them for years. They are far more legitimate than CNN, Fox, BBC, CBC

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I honestly don't know why people post obvious propaganda like this. It's like they don't even care about convincing anyone and are trying to undermine their own argument. It's not as if you can't find more than enough very critical coverage of Israel in reputable sources. Maybe they're so far down the rabbit hole, they genuinely think obvious propaganda outlets are more reliable than something like reuters.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago

Honestly she'd be better off fleeing back into PLO or Hamas protection because she's gonna be on some zion-fascist's hitlist for speaking the truth on international television

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What she said wasn't even that positive. She said that during her capture she was beaten to the point of not being able to breathe well, but after that she was looked after well and got the same food and water as the fighters/her captors, and even got shampoo.

If a statement like this is enough to infuriate Israel, then that's pretty telling on their side

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's a story so unremarkable that it being reacted to this way just makes me wonder how Isntreal treats it's prisoners...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have seen a single tweet by some random guy and it's being used as evidence that Israel officials are mad at her testimony. Fucking what? Is this the state of journalism?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Sadly yes, it's actually incredible and disgusting how many "articles" only have a single post on Twitter as a source.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's surreal that she managed to get on national television and say this. Aren't there whole departments of the government/military dedicated to making sure that that doesn't happen?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I guess they're napping on the job like those forward IDF sentries a couple weeks ago

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://www youtube.com/shorts/QPnJveJLq_4

Interview snippet for the incredulous deboonkers

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

They're mad because she Criticized the Israel government spending 2 billion for no extra protection.

But the facts speak for themselves. She was beaten when she first arrived. Received medical care afterwards. Had to be released at the Egypt boarder, because Israel wasn't negotiating with them.

But you don't have to take my word for it, take Israel's.

Israel won’t negotiate with Hamas on hostages now, will remove it from power

October 14, 2023. Avshalom Sassoni/Flash 90

National Security Council head Tzachi Hanegbi said on Saturday that there are no active negotiation efforts underway by Israel to repatriate the Israelis and some other foreign nationals kidnapped by Hamas last Saturday, saying “there is no way right now to have a negotiation” with the terror organization.

I would say they are in the middle of a war, but these are some rookie mistakes for 5 billion a year.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

I like how they say there's no way to negotiate after several hostages have already been freed. Maybe Israel just sucks at everything but killing people who dont even have tanks.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they allowed Yocheved Lifshitz to make a statement on a live broadcast

Where's a link to this video with a transcription?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/shorts/QPnJveJLq_4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks, but how about the whole thing unedited?

What you posted skipped over the bits where she talked abiut being beaten (according tk the article). Would like to see the footage without slanted editing.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Wait wheres The Onion link? Why is this linking to a real article? 😬

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do we have a link to the source? What she said in her own words?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I saw this article from WaPo the other day quoting her. It's gift link, so should work for all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Worth noting that they still have her husband.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

so why would she say she "went through hell" and got beat with sticks and bruised and stuff? if she's just lying to protect her husband, why wouldn't she say all bad stuff? why would she insist on shaking the Hamas guy's hand instead of just walking past him?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Lol so uh, based on the domain name alone, I’m not sure I’d take the word of that source at face value. That practically shouts “we’re heavily biased”.

This isn’t to say the story should be categorically disregarded.

This is to say that it behooves ALL of us to try to find and post stories that are as unbiased as possible - or, if that’s not possible, pointing out and acknowledging where bias likely exists in the source.