this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
737 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ProPublica

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's crazy that he isn't in prison for this level of corruption. Crazier that he is still actively serving on the highest court in the U.S. His corrupt decisions are actively screwing us.

If these are the bribes that can prove, how many more has he taken that we can't?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Just an educated guess… 69 morbillion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is any of it actually illegal?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It should be. If the Supreme Court Justices can be bought and sold without penalty, what's the point of the justice system?

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've never had 38 vacations in my life and I'm 49yo

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well, pick yourselves up by your bootstraps and become a Supreme Court Justice then! Simple!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Not that simple. You have to work hard on a reputation as a SCOTUS whore.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't had half that many and I'm 70.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Honest question for a 70 yo... how did you discover lemmy? Did you migrate with reddit or from the before times?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I’ve had five vacations and I’m almost 40. Only three as an adult.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In the US, bribery is legal for the ruling class, illegal for everyone else.

Insider trading is legal for the ruling class, illegal for everyone else.

Embezzlement is legal for the ruling class, illegal for everyone else.

It is very hard to not get very wealthy if you are part of the ruling class. Money will just legally flow into your pocket, as long as you're not loyal to the people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t forget drugs. They do a lot of drugs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

C-c-c-yeah!!!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

if it's just a fine... well, you know the rest :\

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you really a public servant if you live like royalty?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unelected... appointed for life... no ethics rules...

Yeah this is some real anti-democratic bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I never understood why we can elect local judges but not our Supreme Court. I understand why people say it's to keep it from being a political position that people run for like the president, but there has to be some harsher regulations on the Supreme Court judges becuase they keep doing shit like this. All the weird shit is to keep them "unbiased" but it's clearly that's just lie we tell the people to keep them placated.

If anyone believes the Supreme Court judges are unaffiliated with political parties, they are willingly ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's horrific that we've arrived at a place where you can read about any conservative in power being caught red-handed committing any crime, and without even looking, you can be 100% sure that Republicans will ignore or deny the problem.

Zero integrity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As all this stuff comes out and gets verified, I keep naively thinking that we will see these people face consequences soon. Eventually someone will have to take action and remove him from his position, but as time passes, nothing happens. The news cycle moves on, and the general population forgets.

It's shit like this that further drives me into nihilism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

100 percent agree. I mean, we talk about Trump facing consequences now, but he was entirely spared any charges for the campaign finance fronts that sent his lawyer to jail, and for which Trump was EXPRESSLY named as a co-conspirator! This was due to the decision of a Republican-dominated committee.

INFINITELY WORSE is that Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, declined to press charges or appoint a special counsel to investigate THE MOST EGREGIOUS CASE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN UNITED STATES HISTORY. Mueller outlined all the ways that Trump thwarted the investigation into Russia's interference in our 2016 election on his behalf.

Trump fired the FBI director, and EXPRESSLY said (caught on tape) that AT THE TIME HE FIRED COMEY he was thinking that this would make the Russia investigation go away. To be clear, if you read this in a law school exam, you would know for sure that the professor was giving you a huge clue that mens rea was established (at the TIME of the criminal act, did the defendant intend to commit the crime). I mean, it was handed to us on a silver platter.

Just to be 100 percent clear on what happened: Trump was given a pass for obstructing the investigation into whether or not he committed TREASON by CONSPIRING with a foreign adversary to interfere with our presidential election.

AND DEMOCRATIC APPOINTED Merrick Garland sat on these charges to the point where they can no longer be filed because of the statute of limitations.

It was OUTRAGEOUS that Trump's own AG didn't press charges, but utter insanity that they weren't filed the instant Trump was out of office.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's not just about whether these people has cases before the court. It's also about their access to influence and instill a political mindset within the Justices that could sway them to decide one way or the other on any issue.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope they are doing this for all of the Justices.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who paid off that Kavanaugh debt?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard that the simplest explanation is daddy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Daddy Kavanaugh wouldn't warrant a complete refusal to answer. "My father paid my debts" isn't a scandalous statement at all and would put to bed a cloud that's been hanging over him since confirmation. That they're not saying such suggests the truth would be a worse look than just leaving the question open.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Like I said, it's just what I've heard because a family gift wouldn't require disclosure and not admitting it was daddy is basically trolling.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

From Reddit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

From Reddit