this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
113 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

nuff said

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

With the way he's running this, I'm a bit confused as to why he didn't just buy Truth Social directly. Wouldn't have cost him nearly as much.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

He bought the users. Elon knows that people are lazy and will not change websites.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

-50% ad revenue says otherwise

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter could have 200% more users, if no one want to show them ads, then ad spots will be dirt cheap. Printing 5 millions of 1cent ads vs 1 million of 10cents ads is not the same. Both on income and expenses...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This, so much this. I also find it rather coincidental that fb cam out with threads soon after the twitter implosion. Opportunistic feasting on a dead carcass perhaps?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Twitter has been on the outs since musk bought it. If Facebook was smart they'd have started right then.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • Your Google search result redirects to Twitter
  • you click and open the link
  • Twitter asks you to login to see the tweet.
  • You close that tab and move on to next search result.

Best way to avoid traffic to your site, then complain about revenue loss from advertisements.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

medium started doing the same shit, sometimes it has interesting articles I'd like to read, but then they started putting in behind registration so I just no longer open medium links.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hell, medium should be paying me to read them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Honestly my wild guess is that he’s trying to make Twitter profitable from subscription based services and not so much from ad revenue.

Can’t really have free speech if platform depends on advertisers and investors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He doesn't really care about free speech. Just his opinions. (He is shadowbanning Ukrainian accounts btw)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Which accounts?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Remember the 50% number is just what he was comfortable with publishing to the public

We have no reason to believe his public statistics

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

100% of the ads I see on Twitter today are dropshipping scams, while in the pre-musk era they were highly targeted to my job and interests to the point that if there wasn't the "ad" tag I couldn't distinguish that.

They can't cost the same for the advertiser, a generic dropshipping scam that targets everyone must be cheap

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Translation: "I'm terrible at business, and I'm making it everyone else's problem"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not losing money, just having "negative cash flow".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I had to search the euphemism to see if I was just out of the loop on the economics terminology, and if those legit were different concepts.

On the downside, they're not. On the upside, Musk is setting a great example for how to stop getting accused of hoarding wealth

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, I think the people at Tesla/SpaceX are probably very happy that Elon has his hands full with Twitter right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe.... I don't know, just throwing ideas out there.... you shouldn't have Musked all over Twitter nor fired its core developers? Again, just thinking out loud....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Wait, the white supremacists and Nazis that he caters to aren’t making up the ad revenue? Well I’ll be!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

50% is just what he's admitting to. Not sure how easily that number can be verified, but if someone told me that the actual numbers were much, much worse... I wouldn't bet against them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Only 50 more percent left to go!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And no interest in thinking about why they're down ~50% in advertising revenue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not waiting to see Twitter fail. I'm just hoping that the federated alternatives for Twitter and Reddit will get more mainstream. And I must say that I'm happy with the way things are evolving at Mastodon and Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Please don't turn this community into another Musk news ticker.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm happy to learn about significant updates to the health of the platform but not as literal Musk tweets pls.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Has he tried not fucking up the platform yet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's impressive how quickly and severely he fucked up what was once a successful tech giant!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I disagree. Twitter was already going under even before he took over. In fact, it was doomed from the beginning as one of the uber era "grow valuation, think about revenue later", hoping to exit someday by selling it to some rich megalomaniac, and actually, they're the ones who succeeded.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Other then a website...what technology does twitter actually do? I do not consider websites to be tech giants.

load more comments
view more: next ›