BiNonBi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

Whenever you see a post. And remember when you post it shows you your post so you must post after you post.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

They are just AC units in reverse. The biggest effect humidity is going to have is on how much condensation is going to form on the exterior radiator. That'll form frost that'll have to be melted in a defrosting cycle. That'll decrease performance and efficacy. Low humidity should keep that to a minimum.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

The fabled Blahaj cuddle pile.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Numbers going up does feel nice and a post not gaining any traction can be disappointing.

Nice thing about Lemmy is it is so small that local and global new feeds are actually usable. Even new communities with no subscribers can get plenty of views from those alone.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago

That's exactly why it needs to be something you are willing to explain. It makes their stories better.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

License changes that will charge developers based on how many installs their game has instead of how many units sold.

560
rule (i.imgur.com)
 
 
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

You are forgetting how they: █████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ██████ ███████ ██████ ███████████ ███ ████████ █████████ ████ ██████ ████ ██ █████

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surveillance, recon and range of weapons has drastically changed. Satellites have the capability to identify a surface fleet and long range weapons are now able to be fired from long distances, find and hit their targets.

I think a couple submarines can effectively negate a carrier task force by just forcing the task force to keep their distance by the threat of a missile launch coming from a patch of seemingly empty see. Any surface ship hunting them is at risk of suddenly becoming the hunted themselves by the submarine or by any land based defense system that are in range.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do they need to be able to fight across the entire Pacific? Their most likely adversaries are right next door and their most likely ally is the dominant naval power already.

I any money spent on a large carrier would probably be better spent on other things. You can spend 10 billion on a single carrier or get a fleet of ~100 F-35s. I would guess mid-air refueling and more planes will get more sorties over likely targets in a conflict than a carrier would.

I also don't think carriers are going to be the dominant sea power force in a future peer conflict. I think the submarine will dominate the next war. The carrier will be regulated to power projection after the sea is won and made safe to operate in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It not usually into the airspace. Just into the air defense zone which is over international waters. It's the nation-state equivalent to "I'm not touching you."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Soviet Union/Russia have a habit of sending submarines into Swedish waters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
243
rule (i.imgur.com)
 
345
rule (i.imgur.com)
 
 
 
409
rule (i.imgur.com)
 
 
 
 
135
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
156
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
view more: next ›