CHEFKOCH

joined 3 years ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Nonsense video, underlying problem is monopolies and private companies who develop the standards, not what browser you use.

If the standards are fully open, transparent and not concerning then it would make no difference if you use chrome and firefox because everyone would use same basis.

Also chromium team is not purchased or owned by Google, most volunteers are normal people, developers or security researchers that code on it in their free time. You can fork, modify the source as you please but that does not change the argumentation about web standards and how build or control them.

1
Arch Linux turns 20 years old (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

At least someone heard me and wrote an article, finally, thanks. It is a big thing that deserves some attention.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why, even FOSS needs support. See OBS Studio, Wikipedia etc. Without supports good projects go to waste.

  • Developers can decide to introduce it in their apps or not. I am sure not every QT developer will adopt this.
  • People will be able to opt-in, opt-out. I am pretty sure they provide us with an option.
  • Most people do not donate, so an additional income thing could help.
  • The other option would be crypto.

We are not talking about MS who introduce ads in Explorer which need some ad-blocking, hosts or registry hacks. Linux is more transparent and there will be options to control this.

Do I like it, nope. But it is better than alternatives to shutdown project because lack of funding or struggling to expand because only few people are willingly to donate.

-5
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

QT Press Announce

https://www.qt.io/blog/monetizing-cross-platform-use-cases-faster-and-easier-with-qt-digital-advertising-platform

Update, got a response in my subreddit. Credit for this finding goes to this fine gentlemen.

 

This is a philosophical question, which means there is no right or wrong answer in a traditional term, but keep trolling to yourself. If you have no own opinion or respect before such question, please do not answer, thanks. I am not looking for low-quality answers such as ... no .. yes ...

I just wanted to ask what Lemmy, or the Community, things about Tech in general and the influence about how we proceed our own reality in general.

Do you think that Technology made us as species better or do you think that Tech makes us overall more lonely because everything gets faster and faster, more optimized and at the end of the day we're just searching for meaning in our lives? Love, fulfillment and such things, which Tech cannot entirely replace.

At the end of your own journey, which I like to call life you basically die alone, maybe with people who love surrounded but you go alone into the void. Would you say that getting the latest iPhone or xyz made you a better individual or helped to improve your overall fulfillment, or would you say that such Tech toys and gimmicks are potentially a placeholder for our own emptiness....?

Legitimate feedback, opinions are welcome.