DarkNightoftheSoul

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

seems less-than-ideal. looks like he's losing a lot of pressure at the unsealed joint between the nozzle and the bellows. also very heavy. maybe if he rigged up some sort of pully mechanism and thinned the clay body, as well as finding some way to seal that joint it could be more successful. then again, the pot already broke being very thick so perhaps not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not that they're indifferent- not that they don't care. It's punishment. Anything to make their lives worse is a good thing. The prisoners "deserve" this treatment. Also, they're slaves and have no real standing to challenge the treatment under the law (source: vibes).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

you have my permission to criticize whomever you wish, even for bad reasons. i will allow this.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is usual for endorsements to be exclusive but that condition is not a requirement. There are good reasons to criticize that bloated party clown. This is not one of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

less talk more walk

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you think american history is only the last 5-10 years, maybe. Perhaps with a very vague, loose use of "one of the".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This was my first guess as well. Literally $.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Huh. There's a whole snopes article on the subject. tldr; You're right, apparently it was the shooter who donated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

that was a 60something with the same name who made the donation

0
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I believe I've found a bug. I intermittently go back multiple pages when pressing back button. It frequently happens on youtube, and occasionally happens elsewhere.

In the picture, find my history where I started with the google search for "the chain" (please forgive me for having history from multiple tabs all mixed up). From here I went back and forth with the expected behavior a couple of times looking for the version I remembered. When I found the correct version, I settled in to listen to it in the background for a few songs minutes until it switched to gypsy which wasn't what I wanted to hear. Naturally enough, I went back once- straight from gypsy to the google search, skipping rhiannon and dreams and the chain. This is reflected on the rightclick drop down from the forward button- observe the three intervening pages which are in the history are not in the forward/back list.

In general, I frequently notice this unexpected and unwanted behavior when I go to youtube. I often go to the homepage, select a video, and then try to back to the homepage only to find it take me back to the blank tab, and when I try to forward it takes me to the video without the intervening homepage.

I seem to recall times when I experienced similar behavior, but cannot put a pin in when or where and cannot at this time, despite trying, reproduce it anywhere but youtube. I haven't tried downloading chrome or shudder using edge, mostly because fuck that, but also slightly because I am very lazy.

I also didn't notice this behavior on my laptop which had win10 and firefox (that is, before I switched to linux as a trial over there, but I digress). I tried to search for this error, but google search is terribly corrupt and difficult to get useful results beyond eg song names. I also searched this forum for "back pages" and "back page" and didn't find anything relevant going back a year.

Do I set my computer on fire for its disobedience, or...?

 

Spambots are abusing this fact

.ml admins fix pls

 

I've recently re-discovered firefox, and have fallen in love with Reader View, but I'm noticing a few problems. Most pages with articles will work just fine, but some refuse to allow reader view, and when you force those pages into reader view it doesn't display the appropriate content.

In today's issue, the website is just happy to allow me to view it in a readable format, but only if I want to read privacy and cookie garbage. How can I select the portion of the page I want to actually read, and tell firefox to ignore whatever bullshit I'm "supposed" to see or whatever?

pic not related

Relevant url: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/police-michigan-city-put-alert-after-wsj-opinion-piece-2024-02-04/

95
Right-hand rule (en.wikipedia.org)
71
Slide Rule (en.wikipedia.org)
view more: next ›