Man that is one stupid name. Up there with aston martin red bull racing tag heuer renault. At least Aston was a car company
Sentau
joined 11 months ago
Damn you work fast
The 4090 isn't that much better than the 4080, and the 4080 is much more energy efficient
The 4090 often beats the 4080 with a margin of 25% or more often has a one percent low figure better than the average frame rates delivered by the 4080. If that is not enough for it to be considered much better, I don't know what is.
Regarding your comments on efficiency, generally the high end is not as efficient as the other GPUs as they are pushed beyond the ideal point of the voltage-frequency curve to extract the most performance. And even after this, in GPU bound scenarios, the 4090 does great as it uses 25-35% more power to deliver 20-30% better fps which puts it on average around 10-15% behind in efficiency which is not enough in my opinion to claim that the 4080 is much more efficient.
Article based on hardware unboxed's review - https://www.techspot.com/review/2569-nvidia-geforce-rtx-4080/
but the 4080 and 4090 absolutely blow previous gens out of the water
Just the 4090, the 4080 is not is not that big a jump compared to the 3090Ti. Considering the 4080 trades blows with the 7900xtx, can't say that it blows previous gen out of the water
I thought OP had meant reverse championship order when he said reverse driver standing order.
We will have multiple slower laps instead of a single faster lap. See F2 for proof of this.
The sprint should be before qualifying. That way people who work on Saturdays would be able to catch quali live without major changes to their schedule
Active also triggers if old-ish posts have new comments in them. Which is why you get 4 day old posts when the have set the feed to sort by Active
I am getting tired of people claiming the car is built around verstappen and twisting albon's words to 'prove' it. Albon clearly says in the article that the car is what it is and that the only reason the car ends up being developed more towards verstappen is because he is faster and hence his inputs are given more weight.
Hell even this year started off with the car suiting Perez but even then Perez could hardly match verstappen and once the car was updated slightly. Why would you give the guy who is at best equally matched and at worst nearly a second behind the other guy equal weightage when it comes to upgrades.
Firstly Perez never says this in the article. Secondly not only people who are at red bull but even people who have left red bull have confirmed that the car is never built for a particular driver. Instead, RB develops the car in a way that makes it faster and that just happens to be a oversteery car. Max is able to live with it and hence is able to extract the performance. If RB had 2 Sergio's they would have needed to make a fundamentally slower car because Perez would be able to extract the max from that car and not to able to do the same with a oversteery car. In that scenario, the car would seem slower than it actually is due to Perez's limitation. Kind of like a CPU bottleneck (Perez) masking the true performance of the GPU(car)
So in Honda's latest flip-flop they're coming back to f1 again, but completely separate to the RBPT Honda engines that Red Bull use?
Yes and no. RBPT is just a honda engine rebadged because honda were leaving and did not want their name on the engine. But they own the ip so while the 2026 Honda program does not link to the RBPT Honda Collab currently going on, there is a good chance that their 2026 PU will use a lot of IP of the current engine.
view more: next ›
Are reddit paying contributors, moderators or people creating posts¿? If no then how are they claiming that buying a golden upvote supports contributors