Looks like a boring update but being boring is kinda the thing I appreciate in GNOME. It's all about expectations.
TheEntity
I'm sure we can compromise on a mandatory database of registered AI-generated content that only the corporations can read from but everyone using AI-generated content is required by law to write to, with hefty fines (but only for regular people).
Single tweets are rarely useful without being able to read some context that isn't visible without logging in.
Looks like Nvidia to me.
It still needs a phone number for registration. You just don't need to share it with people you want to talk with.
But wouldn't a case do exactly what you want? It would make the damn thing thicker and flat on the back.
If you're asking about a personal opinion: any policy purely based on tradition is worthless. Tradition is just peer pressure from dead people. Just like any peer pressure, it's highly unlikely to produce anything but grief. If something is based purely on tradition without any other reason to exist, it's unlikely to be an optimal policy.
Back to the initial question. I don't think we can get infinitely progressive but we can keep subtracting the cruft of tradition until there is no necromantic peer pressure left at all. Mind that if something happens to be a tradition but still has a good reason to exist, it should be evaluated like any other idea in terms of being good or bad. I mean removing just one of the reasons to keep this idea. If it is left with zero reasons, it's out. Otherwise it's fair game.
He's certainly popular but not necessarily liked.
It certainly sounds like you have a strong preference how to split preferences into two groups. ;)
Isn't every rule just a preference of someone influential enough to make it into a rule?
Just more PTO won't help either, unless you consider sitting at home a holiday. I live in Europe and my last proper holiday was in the 00s.
The source got pulled off Github already.