Well you're not entirely incorrect with that assumption. What we call science today is actually the Scientific Method Which is a much more skeptical approach to science than the earlier methods, hence the credibility. I like many others agree that the fees built into the system is quiet absurd and the process is not perfect, but currently that is the only legit way to get others evaluate your research.
Zo0
joined 1 year ago
Shrimp is bug
Well you can change your 'assistant' in Android so not even that.
I have a cheatsheet of all the necessary vim shortcuts!
:q!
where were you when they made the frickin frogs gay
I haven't heard of the Sony-PUBG shenannigans, would you care to tell me more about it?
Lmao I literally bought Rollerdrome today. It's been pretty fun and hectic so far so I do recommend checking it out
＼(°^°)ノ
╰(°^°)／
＼(°^°)ノ
Well accrding to truesteamachievements, the percentage of people who %100 the game is %32.. That can't be right, right?
Not to say I'm not disappointed with respawn, but they handed over Apex development/maintenance to another studio in 2020
view more: next ›
I don't know what to tell you man, sometimes even I wonder if it's worth it at all. Publishing to a journal is such a difficult task. Before submitting your paper you need the approval of two other well-established individuals. Then you send in your paper to your selected journal and each one has some specific format and policies, which many are arbitrary and inthe end of the day depends on the person reviewing your paper. This can take weeks of back and forth.
However if you think you did something noteworthy, as far as I know, this is how you get it in front of the eyes of your peers. Even then there's a chance that your paper gets ignored lol.
So like many others in this thread, I'm not a fan of this process because even though it's strict, a lot of bs still passes through