dandroid

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I remember being upset about the exact same thing when 4G first launched.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Uh, I assumed that was a minimum viable product requirement.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago

Pretty much. How to guarantee I will never buy your brand ever again. Not that I would ever buy a Samsung anyway. Or anything preloaded with Facebook for that matter.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"I'm right, and if anyone disagrees, it's because they're brainwashed"

There's literally no possible way to argue against this type of logic.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm a long time Java developer who was recently moved to a project written in Go. All I can say is: What. The. Fuck. I swear, the people who designed the syntax must have been trying to make every wrong decision possible on purpose as a joke. The only think I can think of is that they only made design decisions on the syntax while high on shrooms or something.

Like, why in the actual fuck does the capitalization of a function change the scope?????? Who thought that was a good idea? It's not intuitive AT ALL. Just have a public/private keyword.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

In the winter months, I live off of unsweetened herbal tea with no caffeine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In my friend circles, the passenger was responsible for playing for the driver.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

It happens! I moderate [email protected], and recently [email protected] merged with us naturally.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That feeling when you're not a recent CS grad anymore 😭

I never even heard of rust when I graduated in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

If you have a good IDE, and Java has the best IDEs of any language I have used, then auto complete will take care of most of that for you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I live in NA, and I have one. Most tea drinkers that I know have them, too. I don't know how I could live without one.

But I guess tea isn't as ubiquitous here. That's probably why people don't have kettles. They wouldn't use them enough to be worth the counter space.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Not sure how exactly that would work. Do you have any ideas? Is there a free translation API that could be used?

 

The mother Giraffe was being very affectionate and rubbing her face on the young giraffe. I just kept snapping photos until I got this one, where they looked like they were sharing a special moment together.

 
 

Take my energy, voyager devs!

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

 

Cat-suki Bakugo

15
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi all. I'm hoping to get some help from folks with more Linux experience than me. I'm not a Linux noob, but I'm far from an expert, and I have some huge gaps in my knowledge.

I have a Synology NAS that I am using for media storage, and I have a separate Linux server that is using that data. Currently the NAS is mounted with samba. it automatically mounts at boot via an entry in /etc/fstab. This is working okay, but I don't like how samba handles file ownership. The whole volume mounts as the user who mounts it (specified in fstab for me), and all the files in the volume are owned by that user. So if I wanted two users on my server to have their own directory, I would need to mount each directory separately for each user. This is workable in simple scenarios, but if I wanted to move my Lemmy instance volumes to my NAS, the file ownership of the DB and the pictrs volumes would get lost and the users in the containers wouldn't be able to access the data.

Is there a way to configure samba to preserve ownership? Or is there an alternate to samba that I can use that supports this?

Edit:

Okay, so I set up NFS, and it appears to do what I want. All of the user IDs carry over when I cp -a my files. My two users can write to directories that I set up for them that are owned by them. It seems all good on the surface. So I copied my whole lemmy folder over and tried to start up the containers, and postgres still crashes. The logs say "Permssion denied" and "chmod operation not permitted" back and forth forever. I tried to log into my container and see what is going on. Inside the container, root can't access a directory, which is bizarre. The container's root user can access that directory when I am running the container in my local filesystem. As a test, I tried copying the whole lemmy directory from my local filesystem to my local filesystem (instead of from local to NFS), and it worked fine.

I think this exact thing might be out of the scope of my original question, and I might need to make a post on [email protected] instead, as what I wanted originally has been accomplished with NFS.

 
 
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

All her friends came to the party, but she didn't want to wear her tutu. At least she (reluctantly) wore her crown long enough to get a picture.

 

Hi all,

I currently have a Linux install from an old 256GB SATA SSD that I inherited. It was originally used as a swap drive in another person's RAID server for about 7 years, then it was given to me, where I put my own Linux install that I have been running for about 5 years.

About a year ago, I acquired a new computer that has an NVMe SSD. It originally ran windows, but I dropped in my SSD with my Linux install, installed grub on the NVMe SSD, and booted to the old SSD.

I am mildly concerned about with this SSD being so old, it could crap out on me eventually. I remember that being a topic of discussion when SSDs first hit the market (i.e. when the one that I am using was made). So I was thinking of wiping the 1TB NVMe SSD that is currently unused in this computer and migrating my install to it. Now, I know I could copy my whole disk with dd, then expand the partition to make use of the space. But I was wondering if I could change the filesystem to something that had snapshots (such as btrfs).

Is it possible to do this, or to change filesystems do I need to create a new Linux install and copy all the files over that I want to keep?

 
view more: next ›