feinstruktur

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Let me help you with the correct wording: 'Power to noise'-converters. You're welcome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've certainly considered that, but have a hard time imagining a comparable performance with large assemblies. Any hands-on experiences?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

FreeCAD is of course the tool of choice for my hobby projects. All of our workgroup's students get an introduction. But while its a great tool, you'll notice the lack of ... management (?) in the background. I'm not bashing or even judging. I very much appreciate all the work put into it. But it's simply ... not there yet to be considered a serious alternative to one of the big players.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Autodesk! All the others! Can you now, goddammit, for the sake of the mental health of your customers, start building your tools on platforms other than this crap? PLEASE? I mean I'm seriously considering building a parallel system running Linux for all my other office needs and just touch my Win-pc to run my CAD. I hope MS will continue in this way and ai-mercialize their OS more and more so hopefully the software providers will have enough at one point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

This. Always be kind to your future self.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Having tested OnShape years ago, where it already appeared very feature rich and smooth, I have no doupt one can for sure realize complex multi-part assemblies with it. For me the interesting part, in a professional environment, would be the software's capabilities of its drawing module. Full digital workflows seem to gain track, but for me detailed technical drawings are still the bread and butter application of a CAD.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For private use strictly FreeCAD, at the job Inventor Professional. While FreeCAD is 'not there yet' in many regards, it's a great piece of software -if- you accept the flat learning curve and invest time. But I understand what you're saying. If you already have a solid understanding of CAD-basics, you rapidly understand what the programmers want to achieve and get there relatively fast. If you expect tabet-esque convenience (which I think from a professional standpoint should not be the goal for a parametric modeler) I get that people get frustrated.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (13 children)

I went to Linux for all private use years ago. And man - I wish so very hard I could simply switch to a non win-native CAD at the job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

So, give me a heads up if you find a reliably working alternative for their FCM that enables common apps to ... work, e.g. mobile payment (not crypto), alarm messaging for emergency forces, e.g. firefighters. I'd say one can easily step back from google if you rely on independent apps and services (done that for a couple of years). But without FCM some shit simply doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

'Schietwettertee' mit Minze, Fenchel, Anis und Kümmel!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Well ... Stranger Things ... I know, I know. But it gives me so good 80's vibes, especially due to the great synthie soundtrack. Can not not mention it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't even know there are Linux tablets out there...

view more: next ›