letsgocrazy

In other words, they’re only interested in punishing the ones that get caught, and they’ll only process it well after it’s happened so they can just deliver a slap on the wrist.

By definition, you can only punish the ones that get caught.

I don't.

I'm a bit clumsy (ADHD) and having a cable attached to my body attached to a €1000 device is asking for trouble. I hate the cable getting tangled up, caught on things etc.

It's weird that he thinks of it as "blackmail" though, and a thing that's happening to "him".

Blackmail is when someone has damning evidence against you and they threaten to release it unless you do what they want.

We saw the damning evidence. It's been released. This is the reaction.

Jesus fucking christ mate turn it in.

He did a comedy show where he repeatedly professed respect fir trans people but criticised the way some people behave, and you're acting like he "isn't fond or minorities getting rights"

It's just fucking psychopathic gibberish with you lot.

If this guy was white he'd be racist against blacks.

What the fuck does that even mean?

He's black.

Calm the fuck down.

I don't think they are all the same, and not all of them cause "offence".

"using the wrong tone" is by definition wrong, so of course it will cause confusion and irritation.

Wouldn't it be aautistic or non-autistic anyway?

N95 was my phone when my friend got the iPhone One. I remember uselessly arguing that my N95 also played videos and music and all that iPhone stuff as well.... Except, it was so fucking slow to take videos.

I remember standing in the street and seeing a massive huge brawl outside of a pub, loads of people doing all sorts of crazy shit and I was standing there desperately trying to record a video while the shitty, sluggish N95 missed it all.

That experience really scarred me because now I'm obsessed with the absolute quick-draw features of modern phones - like the Google Pixel.

Pung.

I understand that's what people need to believe.

Did you read the entire sentence "the British occupying forces in Berlin"

British. In Berlin.

Who do you think had lots of curry powder?

Actually, I'm going to add something to my last reply.

"not wanting to be drowning in ads" is in no way shape or form a political decision.

If you mean "because adverts are capitalism" then you're part of the deeply naive problem.

It's perfectly plausible - because it literally has happened - for people to construct a platform under our system (which is also hybrid anywat) that allows for social media to exist without adverts.

You're literally the kind of person when I mean when I talk about trying too shoe-horn politics into things when it doesn't belong.