magicbeans

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

if the shoe fits...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

the Doctrine of Fascism quite literally contradicts their points.

it does not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

in fact contradicts the point being made

it doesn't

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am not intimately familiar with the institutions in every corner of the earth, but I live in the USA, and I certainly feel that the interests of the state have subsumed all other institutions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

personally, I prefer anarchism. without a state, a state cannot coopt all of society.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

mussolini specifically wanted to shift away from individualism, whereas (at least in lip service) chiangs plan was to teach democracy to the Chinese. a military dictatorship does have a lot of similarity to fascism, though. I suppose I can see where, in this one case, an agrarian societies emergence from warlordism may have been fascist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

it's not mussolini's fascism, where the state brings all other institutions in line with its interests. fascism is a specific thing. that's what the meme is about.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

there is a cure for political illiteracy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (19 children)

liberal democracies are breeding grounds for fascism. every fascist regime has emerged from them.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (40 children)

you can also read mussolini. he says explicitly what fascism is and why. eco is not singularly authoritative on fascism, and his definition gives liberal democracies far too much leeway. modern america, and much of the rest of the developed world, is doing exactly what mussolini would have had us do.

democrats and republicans are both fascist. they don't need to be hitler to be protecting the interest and primacy of the state at the expense of the interests and power of all other institutions. in fact, having hitler as a foil serves well to protect them from accusations of fascism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

harm reduction is a specific strategy, and voting is not harm reduction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The candidate that does the least harm would probably be Cornell West or Jill Stein. voting for the senator who put in place the conditions for roe v Wade to be turned over, the senator who confirmed some of those very same justices, to be president does not reduce harm. if you won't take it from me maybe it'll take it from this guy

https://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/

view more: next ›