mycodesucks

joined 6 months ago
 

Looking at YOU, Williams Street/Warner Bros.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Username (of poster, not OP) checks out.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Ariel has her voice? What'd she trade for legs in this universe?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

"Jeopardize" -> "put a complete end to"

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Huh... turns out I'm a vampire.

 

Specifically thinking about The Little Match Girl and To Build a Fire

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real trick is going to be when his campaign starts AI manipulating photos and videos to make his crowds look bigger, and how they will likely do it badly, and the mockery that will follow.

Of course, he'll just deny it and his followers will accept his denial, but it's business as usual at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, absolutely. There are good reasons why that wouldn't be an option.

But those would get in the way of the joke, so I'm choosing to ignore them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Possibly, but you know who has a history of surviving things that would kill any other crew member and has exhibited at least incredible radiation resistance even in that very same episode?

Also, it's very un-starfleet to consider one member of the crew more irreplaceable or valuable than any other, even if it is true.

 

Why is Worf in Engineering anyway?

 

It's called "CoinciDental"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

See, the thing about the 1+1+1 is that they can't all die at ONCE. Even moving at a reasonable clip, let's say that trolley kills say, one person a second. Two people per second already die anyway, so yes, we're increasing the mortality rate, but humanity can survive that, and statistically a lot of people wouldn't end up dying by trolley. It would SUCK that there's a chance you might wind up on the trolley and dead at any time, but dying is already a natural part of life and it happens to everyone at some point anyway, so there's nothing inherently STRANGE about adding a trolley death every second.

The 100 reincarnating people will be suffering FOREVER, repeatedly, with no reprieve or redemption, and the real kicker is all the other people in the other lane are dying ANYWAY, just as people always have, so it's not like you've really SAVED them - you've just not allowed the mortality rate to increase at the cost of eternal suffering for a few people. Doesn't seem like a good trade.

It's a more interesting question if we change it slightly and all of the infinite people are Wolverine, bub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is this an "Eventually, Kars stopped thinking" supposition? Because that's a valid possibility, but we can't know it for CERTAIN - nobody's ever been doing anything forever, and chronic pain seems to be painful at least on the timescales of decades....

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This assumes the amount of excruciating pain and horror of being run over by a trolley before death is zero, and while I haven't been run over by a trolley personally, I'd have to imagine it's not fun.

 

Why would you assume I agree with something just because I said it?

 

I'll post a complaint about this in 5 minutes when my phone's UI is responsive again.

 
 

It's a much better idea to build it around the moon, which is light all night, rather than the sun, which only shines in the day.

 

Has it always been so hard to afford electricity?

 

As of the July release, future memes will use "It's Chewsday, systemd?"

70
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

If this is where the internet is headed, count me out.

 

I didn't know that was an option... has that been an option this whole time?

view more: next ›