this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

She’s fucking with his fragile ego. It’s gonna drive him to ever more erratic behavior. Shit’s gonna get even more weird.

Shit like this is another Harris win, IMO. She knows how to fight.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The best way to beat a fascist is to make fun of them. Biden droning on about the threat of Trump plays into his hands - it makes him look strong and scary. The way to get at him is making him look small and silly.

Kamala's campaign seem to have the right idea so far. Let's hope she's well-coached for the debate, because it's going to be hugely important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The best way to beat a fascist is to make fun of them.

It worked when Superman made fun of the KKK, and it works today.

https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/superman-crushed-the-kkk-in-1946-heres-why-hes-doi

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm sure there are people who have said it before, but Lindsey Ellis did a great essay on mel Brooks, and the whole point of his comedy being "dude... People marching in synchro is just goofy". The point being how damn fragile a facade is when there's nothing behind it, and how much these kind of "strong men" depend on it.

The whole "weird" thing was the perfect shot. The reason it works is because it's also true "no man, you're not to tough for me, you're just... Fucking weird..."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That is how you make him mad and throw him off balance. Hit him at every ego point. I’ll bet when she goes for these weaknesses it will make him look weak even to his base. That will demoralize them and keep some home on Election Day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This seems kinda stupid... but it's a great strategy. Trump actually pays attention to this kinda stuff and will make a stink over it.

It reminds me of the Lincoln Project's "audience of one" strategy, where their ads were basically just meant to be viewed by Trump on cable news.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

His followers also respond to it. It demoralizes them from voting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They want to feel like the underdogs but they don't want to be seen as weak so this doesn't hurt one bit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real trick is going to be when his campaign starts AI manipulating photos and videos to make his crowds look bigger, and how they will likely do it badly, and the mockery that will follow.

Of course, he'll just deny it and his followers will accept his denial, but it's business as usual at this point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

After all the money spent on legal fees they can probably only afford to have Trump sharpie in some stick figures.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real question is - do they let him see these commercials? I can easily imagine a team of people whose only job is to shield him from media coverage and things like this 24/7.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He watches TV. George Conway has been doing an experiment. He's been micro targeting ads to micro target Trump specifically to get a reaction.

They bought ad time on fox and things like the golf channel for the region around Mar a Lago. And as soon as the ads played Trump started rage posting on social media.

See https://youtu.be/oTDqBO0yGPQ for an example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The ad they put together was fantastic!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I so want an “I did that!” Sticker!!! Several of us Cat Ladies for Kamala on Facebook RSVP’ed from afar. 😈

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least if the Twitter comments are to believed that video was from 1.5hr before the Trump rally. I'm sure it annoys him the same as if it were real, but this isn't beneficial to ensuring Democrats realize the urgency to get out and vote in November.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think the latest Harris rally was packed multiple hours before it started so that may be the angle they're going for.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure yeah. Fuck Trump, wholeheartedly. But it sure would be nice to hear some actual policy plans instead of fluffy quotes. What are we doing in the first 100 days?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The team is actively working on that. It takes a while to create a "policy plan".

But you know that, and are just parroting what you heard the TV heads said.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She had one before she joined up with Biden. She would use that if she had any backbone. Instead we'll end up with a "move to the center".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So your great idea is for her to use her policy plan that hasn't been touched in 5 years?

Sure, buddy. Great idea. 🙄

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My idea is for her to actually believe in something rather than shifting with the political winds... but I suppose I'll just look the other way on that because she is not Donald Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The part I like is how you shift from one dumb argument to another! Good job man!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Shifting? Seems pretty consistent to me.

Wanting a candidate with conviction, who had a solid platform in 2020 and is currently shifting with the political winds, is far from a dumb argument.

It won't hurt you to be honest about her flaws, anyone who actually believes in America won't vote for DT anyway.