octopus_ink

joined 8 months ago
 
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That bump in 2020 is kind of interesting. The reason seems obvious, but correlation does not equal causation and all that. It does make me wonder if a big chunk of people claiming to be unaffilated are doing so because they think it's the correct answer to give, not because it's actually true. (My theory being that the pandemic made them decide they better stop denying Jesus for awhile or whatever)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sure, there's that. But no one is calling the bricklayers to disrupt union activities of other workers. The Starbucks local union organizers aren't going to have to worry that the pipefitters union is coming for them. Cops on the other hand are literally the primary tool of unionbusting. It's impossible to even pretend there is equivalence there while this remains true.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Outside America, cops have a union.

They have "unions" in the US too. The shield them from consequences and fight against accountability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There is no big plan to weaken encryption or anything.

This may not be a symptom of such a plan, but there very much is such a plan.

Exportation of PGP and similar "strong encryption" in the 90s was considered as exporting munitions by the DoD.

it was not until almost two decades later that the US began to move some of the most common encryption technologies off the Munitions List. Without these changes, it would have been virtually impossible to secure commercial transactions online, stifling the then-nascent internet economy.

More recently you can take your pick.

Governments DO NOT like people having encryption that isn't backdoored. CSAM is literally the "but won't someone think of the children" justification they use, and while the goals may be admirable in this case, the potential harm of succeeding in their quest to ban consumer-accessible strong encryption seems pretty obvious to me.

As a bonus - anyone remember Truecrypt?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/rhodium-enterprises-bitcoin-usd-loan-bankruptcy

https://www.csoonline.com/article/547356/microsoft-subnet-encryption-canary-or-insecure-app-truecrypt-warning-says-use-microsoft-s-bitlocker.html

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

Not knowing much about McLean except his age (and American Pie) I was half-expecting a conservative sideswipe against her, where he questioned her relationship with Kelce or her (so far) childlessness or something. I was pleasantly surprised that this was nothing of the sort.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

The ex-deputy also faced accusations from his former wife in divorce proceedings that he treated her with "repeated acts of mental cruelty." A separate citizen complaint against Grayson in May alleged that he unlawfully tried to intimidate a 17-year-old girl while trying to enter a house without having obtained a warrant, yelling at her and threatening to "put her in cuffs" if she didn't let him inside. The complaint was found not sustained by one of Grayson's fellow officers.

Thank goodness there was a good apple there to toss out that complaint!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

You are exactly right and here is a comic that explains it. But nearly 0 websites have caught on to this.

https://xkcd.com/936/?correct=horse&battery=staple

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Whew yeah that's a shitty one too. Good job working it out!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

THIS is the one that makes me the angriest.

I'm happy to comply with your complexity requirements, but don't tell me about each one only when I've failed to meet it. That's really past the bar of shitty design into the realm of asshole design.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I refuse to believe this will impact DD in any meaningful way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Whatever blip Bud Light experienced was due to their flip flopping. I was ready to start stocking up for our annual July 04 bash and would have gone out of my way to buy some (even though I don't normally) until they rolled over for the magas and fired the person responsible for sending that single can of bud light to a trans influencer. I know others had a similar thought process, because I've seen it discussed online and in meatspace.

I'm sure I've bought products that they own since then unknowingly, but haven't knowingly bought an AB product since then. All they had to do was take a stance, but they proved to be exactly what all megacorps are - greedy and spineless. Edit: Just like Target, I might add.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Fair point, I see where you are coming from. This is definitely one of those "I'd rather be wrong" opinions on my end.

 
 

Lots more good stuff with citations in the article, but this bit really ties it all together:

 

The right-wing obsession over racial demographics becomes obvious in the “pro-natalism” movement, which advocates for conservatives to have more children to take control of society. The mission of the movement is “to build an army of like-minded people, starting with their own children, who will reject a whole host of changes wrought by liberal democracy,” according to a fascinating recent story in Politico.

For the right wing, pro-natalism means looking for every possible means to increase the white percentage of the nation’s population. Through this lens, it’s not hard to see why Republicans remain virulently anti-immigration and strictly opposed to abortion.

Those two issues may appear unrelated, but in fact Republican positions on both stem at least in part from white demographic fears. Republicans want to halt the rise in the nonwhite population by curbing immigration. At the same time, they hope their abortion bans will boost domestic birth rates — staving off white demographic decline. They also want to ban contraceptives and no-fault divorce, forcing women to stay in marriages and have more children.

The Republican Party’s white nationalism is often justified in religious terms, since much of this agenda designed to enhance white power stems from the party’s Christian fundamentalist base. Along with Protestant evangelicals, the Republican religious base now includes fundamentalist Catholics, who stridently oppose abortion.

 
1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

So here I am sitting on lemmy.ml which is defederated from threads (and which I chose primarily for that reason) and I see a comment from the user above.

That comment is on a community at lemmy.world, and the user is apparently registered with their @threads username through @sh.itjust.works.

IIRC .world does NOT respect the fedipact, and I guess this means sh.itjust.works must not either, but I'm super confused by the username.

So I guess I still need to just block all the threads users I see, defederation or not?

1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›