ssorbom

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Correct on both counts.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It’s so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don’t exist?

As a handicapped person myself, it really baffles me how people think car oriented infrastructure is so much better for us. I am a wheelchair user, and I live in a 15 minute neighborhood. Getting around in my wheelchair is a million times simpler there than in my old car-centric suburb, because the same disabilities that make me wheelchair bound also prevent me from driving. Which mean that in a car-centric environment I do one of the following:

a) Rely on the generosity of friends and family to cart me around at their convenience, or b) Utilize shared access rides, which are door to door, but take longer than using public transit, or c) Roll myself to underserved suburban bus stops over badly maintained sidewalk, and pray I make it on time.

None of which are appealing.

Meanwhile, in my 15 minute city:

  • The buses often run at 10 to 15 minute intervals (vs 30 to 60 minutes in the suburb),
  • Sidewalks are larger
  • I have less distance to travel in the first place
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

I say this as somebody who cannot drive. And I say it with all the love in the world for public transit. Public transit absolutely cannot get you everywhere, at least not if you expect to be there in a timely manner. The vast majority of America is suburbanized, the worst possible environment for buses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a big difference between identifying yourself to a neutral ISP versus identifying yourself to the government. In general, I'm not that skeptical of government, but this is one issue where I worry about the right wing loonies getting their way. God help us if it's ever criminalized

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I say this as a train lover. They require a lot more infrastructure than planes and will always be at a disadvantage because of that. You can set up an airport pretty much anywhere and make it reachable by pretty much anyone. Whereas with the train, you need a dedicated line from point to point that you will commit to maintaining through hell and high water.

There's also the problem that in many countries, we are deliberately neglecting our train infrastructure and not investing in high speed alternatives that could compete with an airline over shorter distances.

All of these factors combine to make individual trips less efficient over train. I had to cross the United States this week. To do so by train would have taken me 4 days. Doing so by plane took me 6 hours. Nobody would choose a 4-day trip over a 6-hour one unless their goal is to look out the window a lot. Which is perfectly valid. But most people don't look at traveling itself as the experience. And in this case, I had a particular event that I had to attend.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, I think it is reasonable to rate things you have no complaints about as high as possible. If I see a rating with three stars, I assume that it was okay with a few rough spots. I like the idea that all products start out as five stars unless there is something really wrong, and you start knocking points for problems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

To be clear on this, I AM an urban core dweller, and I LOVE it. I am never more than 15 minutes walk from a grocery store, and significant cultural events are right on my doorstep. But there are downsides, and I understand why it is not everyone's cup of tea.

Hate people? sucks for you, your only refuge will be your apartment. Clean freak? get used to some grunge, because there is oderous shit everywhere. Need to get to more sparsely populated areas? Expect to spend double the time on the road using transit, or pay through the nose to keep a garage with a car you barely use otherwise.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As much as I like this article, he glorifies cities too much. They have always been seen as places to get away from. Charles Dickens Victorian England portrayed in books like a Christmas story, and Oliver twist was absolutely a living hell. It's only in the last 50 or so years that cities have actually become pleasant places to live again, and even then, the city dweller makes sacrifices.

Have you ever tried living in the urban core? Be prepared to deal with cockroaches, inconsiderate out of towners who will leave everything from broken glass to s*** in the streets, and graffiti "artists"who believe it is their god-given right to scrawl whatever they want wherever they want it.

When the suburbanite says he wants to get away from the city, there are legitimate things he is trying to get away from. I personally think these things are worth the cost, but will never sell the vision of the city on a lie.

EDIT: to be clear to the downvoters I say this as somebody who currently lives in a near-ideal cityscape. In America at least, you need to be prepared to make sacrifices if this is the life you want to lead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I picked up Portal 2 during a $2 sale of it. Still one of the best games I've ever played. And it has multiplayer, so it's infinitely replayable

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (17 children)

You won't have a choice if it's a bank or your job. This is the truly insidious thing, if enough important websites start demanding the standard, you might just end up forcing yourself off of the internet with that attitude

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I can't comment to that specific place, but buses have the advantage that they are easy to redeploy along different routes if necessary. Accomplishing the same feat with the train is extraordinarily difficult. Trains make sense along heavily populated corridors with a pre-existing need for the business.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

First, it's federated, meaning that different instances of discord can talk to each other, much like Lemmy.

Second, it allows for encryption. Matrix uses the same double ratchet algorithm present in signal.

Third, joining groups is optional. This is perhaps the biggest user interface difference between discord and matrix. Each conversation exists in a independent channel, or room as they are called. Rooms can be grouped together the way you would see in discord, but they usually exist independently of the groupings. Incidentally, matrix groups are called spaces. There are edge cases where rooms are not independent from spaces, but by and large it is not something most users will have to worry about.

 

one of my favorite communities on Reddit was called r/cityporn. it wasn't nsfw, just people sharing pictures of cityscapes and skyscrapers. I was wondering if there were equivalent communities like that on lemmy?

view more: next ›