sun_is_ra

For me just tail in 3ed picture (back view). Look less like a tail and more like something coming down

He was coming strong in front of Biden. if he back down now he'd appear scared

My guess is that laptop 1 is connected to the HD through USB2 not USB3. Or u r using USB hub

You're telling Israel is doing what is doing with no US protection whatsoever?

Nothing as US doesn not protect China

neat idea but it didn't work for me (Linux x86_64). code compiles fine but prints nothing

thats probably because he wasnt used to saying them when he was younger

also people's mental health varies and your dad might still have better mental health

If the tracking software is open source what is stopping employees from changing source code to their advantage ?

Copying the top comment in HN discussion

avianlyric 1 hour ago | next [–]

The title of this article is very misleading, suggesting that EU governance is some kind unified body, and that these documents actually represent what “The EU” wants to do.

EU governance is far more complicated, and these documents only represent the view of one part of the EU governance system, the EU Council.

The EU council is basically made up of people sent by the state governments of all the members, and basically represents the views of those state governments. The council is the only legislative writing body in the EU, but it has no power to enact legislation. It can only write proposed legislation, and present it to the EU parliament for voting on.

The EU parliament is made up of directly elected MEPs and represents the interests of EU citizens as a whole, and not as individual member states. To get legislation passed, the parliament and council need to work together to get legislation written that the council is happy to write, and the parliament is happy to enact. The council is small body of 27 people, representing the interests of state governments, and the parliament 705 MEPs and represents “the people”.

There’s currently no evidence that these proposals by the Council will have any success in the parliament, if anything quite the opposite. The EU parliament has made I quite clear they don’t like this type of draconian legislation, and won’t vote to enact it.

Obviously that doesn’t mean we should ignore these proposals. It’s important to make it clear we don’t like it, and lend weight behind the arguments being put forward by MEPs to block this legislation. But to say this represents the EU “doubling down” on penalising privacy-friendly services is ridiculous. It represents the EU council doubling down, but that only one small part of the EU governance bodies, and the other bodies are actively fighting back.

This based on what?

Stack Overflow does not let you delete questions that have accepted answers and many upvotes

He tried to circumvent the rule so he got banned for 7 days

Cat-bread would keep rotating ~~and never falls~~ as it falls to the ground