this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Android

16862 readers
16 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: [email protected]


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: [email protected]

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: [email protected]

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to [email protected].

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to [email protected].

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (7 children)

If you're considering buying one you might want to take into account that they removed the headphone jack so they can sell their own wireless buds and headphones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I care less about the lack of a headphone jack and more about the lack of multiple ports

USB C is genuinely a great multiport, but all of these companies leave the phone with one port. People would care less if each phone had two ports, so you could plug in headphones via adapter while also charging

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There are actually dongles which have both an audio jack and a USB c port. I never used one of those dongles though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Those suck worse than the old school 3.5mm splitters we all used back in the discman, and later iPod days.

The removal of the headphone jack is one of the worst developments in personal electronics over the last 30 years. Personally I hope that the EU's next port mandate forces its reintroduction as Bluetooth headphones are an environmental catastrophe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I have. They tend to be poorly shielded so you get all kinds of hiss and other shenanigans in the audio when you're charging and listening at the same time. The adapters exist, but I've yet to come across one that isn't terrible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I just keep a USB c dongle permanently attached to my wired headphones, I forget it's there. It adds like 1" to the overall cable length. I basically just converted all my wired headphones into USB c headphones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

you mean this strange old socket that is (at least for me) primarily used for collecting dust since almost a decade? yeah, personally I can live without it.

and this fortunately is not apple. You can use every brand of earbud and use all of the features, so I don't really get your point at all. the phone is very good and I hope I will be able to use it until the 30s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I always plug in my car stereo to that old socket in my car...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You might want to look into a bluetooth to FM radio dongle

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I tried one, it sucked balls, it was a cheap brand though, so I'm open to recommendations.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Tell me a pair of wireless headphones that are as good and around the same price as the moondrop Aria's with extremely low latency (so they can be used for rhythm games) and can buy a replacement case for not too much.

Also Bluetooth's audio quality is terrible when also using the microphone at the same time. So you can't really make a call and enjoy listening to music at the same time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but why would you make a calla and listen to music at the same time?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I used to do it all the time during Corona while being home schooled.

Or when you simply just want to watch a video together.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Having a headphone jack will let you use any kind of headphone produced in the last 50 years, which has a 3.5mm jack. Also, while listening to music you could also charge your phone, if you choose to, but not with a USB-C only port. Furthermore, USB-C DACs are stupid, they are an annoyance, even the ones with the shortest cables - I broke three of them in two months because they're idiotically designed and they don't fold in my pocket - a thing that never happened with headphone cables.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

You also don't get a noticeable delay on the audio, which imo makes watching any video horrible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That was one of the main reasons I was interested in their phones :/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

The lack of headphone jack is the sole reason I went with Samsung XCover 6Pro instead. Shame really, because I'm the kind of person who uses their device for +5 years, and prefer fixing stuff myself, but when Apple removed the headphone jack I made a decision to never buy a device without one if there's an alternative with it and I'm still sticking with that. I bought an "outdated" laptop aswell because the newer model didn't have USB-A, HDMI or a card reader. Ironically the most recent models now do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is this a fair argument in 2023 with all the options for wireless headphones/buds? I feel like it still sucks because you can't use your dollar store wired sets, but there are enough cheap raycon clones out now that it's hardly a guaranteed secondary sale at this point.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Tell me a pair of wireless headphones that are as good and around the same price as the moondrop Aria's with extremely low latency (so they can be used for rhythm games) and can buy a replacement case for not too much.

Also Raycons are trash. Like they're literally e-waste for how bad they are

Also Bluetooth's audio quality is terrible when also using the microphone at the same time. So you can't really make a call and enjoy listening to music at the same time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who is listening to music on the same headset while making a phone call?

And why use your phone's onboard DAC at that point if you want quality headphones?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And why use your phone's onboard DAC at that point if you want quality headphones?

Some phones (LG) did actually come with a HQ DAC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

At that point you're getting a very specific phone for a very specific purpose. It's not the rule but the exception. So it doesn't apply as a reason for any other phone. You've argued why the LG has a 3.5mm jack, not why Fairphone should have a 3.5mm jack. I'd also be curious as to how powerfully it can even drive headphones at that point. It must also have a stronger amplifier than most phones too. It'd be meaningless without it. What's the point of high fidelity if it can't drive headphones that can utilize it.

This is all getting away from the purpose of the Fairphone. It's not a dedicated music player. It's not advertising high fidelity music, psrticyij relation to other phones. I don't think anyone is calling that LG phone "green" either.

Congratulations to anyone who can think of an edge case that wouldn't apply to the Fairphone. Might as well mention a tensor chip not being in the Fairphone.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I already have a good set of headphones. I don't want to buy new ones or adapters, especially when I can just buy a device that they can plug straight into

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Look, I do understand, and it took me a while to buy into the wireless buds thing, but you could have made the same argument for PS/2 mouse and keyboards, or anything using mini, and then later, micro USB.

The fact is, if you want to keep your old peripherals, but upgrade your main compute device, at some point you need to accept that you'll need an adapter.

The 3.5mm jack was first introduced in the 1950s as a mini version of the 6.5mm jack... which was used as far back as 1878... it's had a hell of a run, but if you weigh the pros and cons fairly, wireless as a standard has drawbacks, but is actually, ultimately an upgrade and it's well overdue.

I just think there are enough wireless options (and adapters) available now that it's not fair to knock fairphone for this decision anymore.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You're arguing as if wireless audio is somehow better as ps2, etc was replaced by something better.

It's simply not. You either buy a dumbass dongle or have to charge yet another thing. Along with that you can't charge and listen to music at the same time without aforementioned dumb wireless ear buds.

It was a money grab, plain and simple. The 3.5 Jack is still monumentally viable and an asset.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s simply not.

Ye, well, that's just, like, your opinion man...

But seriously, that highly subjective. I'll take wireless over wired any day thanks. The inconvenience of having to charge the buds is not actually as bad as you're making it out to be. You can charge and listen if you consider charging the case as still being charging the whole unit.

The convenience of not having to deal with the damm cables themselves outweighs the inconvenience of needing to occasionally charge them for me, and clearly I'm not alone.

Someone smarter than me can talk about audio quality over wireless, but when we're talking about streaming music from Spotify, it's moot anyway.

The fact is, for the vast majority of mobile users, wireless is an upgrade over wired.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

But seriously, that highly subjective. I'll take wireless over wired any day thanks.

You're right, it is subjective. The point is, you don't have to choose. You can have both and sacrifice nothing. But what you want is simply for everyone else to have fewer options.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

My main issue with all of this is that I'm not interested in maintaining a charge for yet another wireless device.

I'm a frequent flier for work. My wired noise cancelling headphones run on a single AAA battery for 14+ hours straight. I can buy a small pack of AAA batteries at the airport in 30 seconds and get 60 hours of listening time. I don't have to worry about putting them back in their carrying/charger case. I don't have to worry about charging that case. If they go flat and I don't have a spare AAA battery (the case actually has a convenient hole for a spare AAA), they still work, albeit with a noisier background. And they plug into in flight entertainment system headphone sockets. Haven't seen a Bluetooth option on IFE systems yet.

Would I want to go jogging with my wired headphones? No. I do have a pair of bose wireless earbuds, and they're nice. But every time I think about using them, they are flat in their charging case. I don't want to have to keep the charging case on charge soooooo for 90 percent of my usage , the wired ones it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My noise-canceling, Bluetooth headphones in 2004 ran for 2 days, no problem (back when I was flying for work all the time).

"Another thing to charge" is a strawman. They all use C or micro today, and headphones use so little power your laptop can easily charge them. Or even your phone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Another thing to charge" is a strawman.

They are not functional for the time it takes to get a useful charge into them. I'll just pause that movie and pop my buds back into their charging case for a while, it's so convenient. So, like I said, you have to maintain their charge, alongside the other devices that have to have their charge maintained.

A lot of it has to do with BLE running constantly in the background (things like find my buds, "easy connect" features with their own management app tend to use it). If you fly like, once a week , and have a headset for flying, you need to check on its charge, as BLE will slowly grind it down to nothing while it sits in your travel bag.

My noise-canceling, Bluetooth headphones in 2004 ran for 2 days, no problem (back when I was flying for work all the time).

What brand were they? I bought my current set of Bose corded noise cancelling headphones in 2015 precisely because battery life in Bluetooth products was still reasonably abysmal. I'm guessing that they were one of the very first sets to come out, seeing that regular consumer Bluetooth headphones only appeared on the market in 2003.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you could have made the same argument for PS/2 mouse and keyboards, or anything using mini, and then later, micro USB.

You could but it would be a shit argument because that was a very logical and objective improvement and this is not.

The 3.5mm jack was first introduced in the 1950s

That is a pro, not a con. Because it means my headphones and other devices, regardless of how old, will still work just fine on brand new devices. Meanwhile your shitpod headphones will have to be thrown away after a year and you have to lick Tim Cook's boots to buy another pair.

I just think there are enough wireless options (and adapters) available now that it's not fair to knock fairphone for this decision anymore.

And all of them come with drawbacks, and having a headphone jack comes with none.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it would be a shit argument

This is fundamentally where we disagree. See my other comment

That is a pro, not a con

Never said it was a con, nor did I mean to imply that jacks are obsolete overall, only that it's a valid move to not include them on a device that is primarily used to stream audio and thus doesn't need the extra fidelity. Unless you want to try and tell me that Joe Public should be lugging around gigabytes of flac files?

lick Tim Cook’s boots

Lol, personally I prefer the taste of Han Jong-hee or Kenichiro Yoshida's boots

jack comes with none.

Respectfully, this is rose tinted glasses talking. Do you know what my wireless buds workflow is?

  1. Open case
  2. Insert buds into ears and wait for "Bluetooth connected"
  3. Tap left bud
  4. Music plays.

Compare that to

  1. Pull out buds
  2. Untangle cord
  3. Pull out phone
  4. Fumble jack into the microphone hole for 2 minutes
  5. Look at device, and insert jack into correct hole.
  6. Unlock phone
  7. Open music app of choice
  8. Hit play
  9. Music plays

With wireless buds, I don't even have to know exactly where my phone is. To say nothing of having to carry it around with me which, if you're doing housework, or a workout can be a pain.

Also, anyone who's ever had buds forcibly ripped from their ears because they've dropped their phone will tell you:

Wired buds ALSO have drawbacks

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is fundamentally where we disagree. See my other comment

I replied to "your other comment".

only that it's a valid move to not include them on a device that is primarily used to stream audio and thus doesn't need the extra fidelity.

The fidelity is one of many many pros we have listed

Unless you want to try and tell me that Joe Public should be lugging around gigabytes of flac files?

I don't understand what this has to do with anything.

Do you know what my wireless buds workflow is?

You're missing the point. Pros and cons of each don't matter because you don't have to choose. You can have both. We had both, for decades. You can continue using whatever workflow you want. The existence of a headphone jack does not stop you from continuing to use Bluetooth. I was obviously referring to the cons of having the option of choosing wired.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I replied to β€œyour other comment”.

I meant the one made elsewhere in this thread where I explain why I don't think it's a shit argument. I think the wireless is a legitimate upgrade over wired when we're talking about a mobile phone.

The fidelity is one of many many pros we have listed
I don’t understand what this has to do with anything.

I'm trying to point out that your "pro" of better fidelity doesn't mean anything in a space where people aren't using a lossless format, and so aren't taking advantage of that extra fidelity anyway. This is admittedly an area I'm not strong in, so I could well be wrong, but I don't think there's any difference between wired and wireless when the source is Spotify.

you don’t have to choose.

Alright, this is fair. It would be great to keep the option for both. However, I don't think it's fair to knock Fairphone for not offering this option though, particularly because it takes space on the pcb and is an extra component cost (yes, a small one, I admit)

People are calling it a money grab move to not include a headphone jack, and I just don't think that's fair.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You can also buy a cheap USB C-to-headphone-jack adapter.

The main reason they did it is to get a higher water-proof rating, making it easier to last longer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Please stop with water resistance nonsense. There were phones with headphone jacks that were waterproof.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Copying my reply to this same point from elsewhere:

Those phones were presumably glued together and not as repairable as the Fairphone is. Which is very useful, but does lower your waterproof rating, hence the need to compensate elsewhere.

I really feel like people are too quick to assume malice, generally. Often, there are just trade-offs with no clearly-right answer, and it's not obvious to folks like us on the outside what those trade-offs are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Galaxy S5 not only had a headphone jack and was water resistant but it had a removable battery as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Could you also replace the screen, camera's, USB port, loudspeaker and earpiece with nothing but a screwdriver?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No one doesn't know that you can use an adapter. No one wants to carry that around. They cost money and you have to keep track of them. And you can't charge the phone and listen simultaneously.

They did not do it to improve waterproofing. We have had several phones over the course of decades that were both very water resistant and included headphone jacks, so you can just stop with that capitalist non-sense.