this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5054 readers
384 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes. US law treats the right to drill as a property right once a lease is issued. Makes it tough to actually say no. His administration tried a moratorium, lost in court, and concluded an appeal would not succeed. There are environmentalists who wanted the appeal tried, but didn't win out on that
are you talking about the moratorium on the leasing itself of federal land?
There was also Biden buckling to Manchin's demands which included mandating drilling. Concessions had to make within his own Party.
He buckled in a way that's cutting emissions.
Yes, in negotiating down BBB to get Manchin's support.
what exactly was he supposed to do if he didn't have enough senators to get it passed without Manchin's support?
Eh, I think it is fairly moot as Biden would have to have confidence that progressive policy (especially regarding climate change) has popular support and he would not be blamed (or even hurt) by pushing for their passage.
Manchin and Biden would almost certainly have stood to benefit from having passed BBB in the first place. Before that they and the Democratic Party would have had a net benefit passing the Green New Deal.
We’ll all be environmentalists soon. /s