this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5053 readers
388 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

and ironically has signed more drilling permits than dopey trump.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes. US law treats the right to drill as a property right once a lease is issued. Makes it tough to actually say no. His administration tried a moratorium, lost in court, and concluded an appeal would not succeed. There are environmentalists who wanted the appeal tried, but didn't win out on that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

are you talking about the moratorium on the leasing itself of federal land?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There was also Biden buckling to Manchin's demands which included mandating drilling. Concessions had to make within his own Party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, in negotiating down BBB to get Manchin's support.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what exactly was he supposed to do if he didn't have enough senators to get it passed without Manchin's support?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Eh, I think it is fairly moot as Biden would have to have confidence that progressive policy (especially regarding climate change) has popular support and he would not be blamed (or even hurt) by pushing for their passage.

Manchin and Biden would almost certainly have stood to benefit from having passed BBB in the first place. Before that they and the Democratic Party would have had a net benefit passing the Green New Deal.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

We’ll all be environmentalists soon. /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, Republicans will only remember the climate measures and seek petty revenge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Credit where credit is due.