this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
12 points (62.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25937 readers
986 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I understand when people speak about the ethical problems with eating meat, but I think they do not apply to fish.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In a global ecological sense, it is worse to eat fish than pork, we are sucking the seas dry, we have known it for decades, and invented new methods to do it more efficiently.

With land animals you can see the conditions and the effect of over production, with fish you don't, and we keep at it.

Grown fish is less bad, but still contribute to pollution of the seas.

Trawling should be banned globally for a minimum of 50 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We have also invented ways to do it more sustainably, and even have handy wallet sized Sustainable Seafood Lists for each region of the US to make sure you make sustainable choices when eating at restaurants or purchasing at the market
Seafood Watch Guides

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

@Alue42 we used to have these in New Zealand. It was a card you could keep in your wallet, listed all the common eating fish from best to worst, with sustainable ones coded green at the top and endangered ones in red.

But it was depressing over the years with each new edition to slowly see all those green fish turning orange and then red as each species became depleted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I just tried looking for you, and the most up to date I could find was for 2017. That's disappointing, but slightly out of date is better than nothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

@Alue42

By 2017 it had already happened - almost all the NZ fish had gone from the green zone and they'd started putting farmed shellfish and stuff caught in international waters at the top of the list to make up for it.

I think those of us who care about our local marine environment seldom eat actual fish now. We don't really need a guide any more.