this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

Lord of the memes

7820 readers
272 users here now

The Lord of the rings memes communitiy on Lemmy. Share memes about Lord of the rings and be respectful.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

At risk of being a dork I’ll also compare this to Star Trek (largely because OP is a clear fan). Both series are really timeless and impactful imo because they portray people as almost supremely emotionally intelligent. Everyone is very professional when they need to be - capable of great emotional restraint, but also deeply empathetic and caring and ‘tender’ when the time is right.

I mean Gimli is supposed to be the “emotional hothead” of the Fellowship and he’s literally more chill and emotionally controlled than most of the people you run into working retail

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

That's why Star Trek is sometimes referred to as "competency porn."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's almost embarrassing to admit, but TNG was a factor for me in finding emotional maturity.

I was a happy, naive child that was lucky to get to 8 before everything sorta fell apart. Parents divorced, sexual abuse from within the extended family by different people, having to toughen up at school due to the emotional issues starting to crop up, abandoned by a parent because of their addiction, and even the social pressure during the satanic panic (this was obviously the 80's).

Somehow, I did manage to keep some of the happy-go-lucky and naivete, but otherwise I had a rough time reigning in my temper and sometimes would break into tears from being overwhelmed (alone, obviously, because I had to be manly).

When I got into watching TNG, I really admired Picard as a character template, and worked on some of my own self perceived character flaws, and why I acted the way I did. Essentially, looking for the causes and not the symptoms. It was the start of a growth that continues still. His morality and introspection as an archetype gave me hope.

A therapist surely would've been a better way to go about it, but those weren't really much of an option for us back then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't be embarrassed about that at all. TNG also showed me the world I wanted to build for the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

As someone who spent time in the military, I know exactly what you mean.

I wish the people I worked with were 25% as competent, rational, and level headed as the crew of the Enterprise.

Edit: Spelling

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It’s funny, when I was a fresh college grad I actually considered joining the millitary because I really did have a desire for that competent, almost bureaucratic professionalism and mature outlook.

Then I kind of got my heads out of the clouds and realized diction and reality are pretty separate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Television in general can be "competency porn". Nobody speaks to each other in real life with the attentiveness and thoughtfulness of TV show characters. Most people are devoid of empathy and bad at conversation. If you try to be as attentive and witty and empathetic as characters on TV (the ones at least that aren't written to be terrible people a la IASIP) people will think you're autistic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Oh shit, everybody knows I'm autistic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Suddenly vanishes the moment you're promoted to Admiral, apparently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

turn it around, only shitty people tend to be promoted to such positions, it's like the saying that the best president is one who doesn't want the position.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I was just making a joke about how every admiral in the franchise turns out to be the bad guy in some way, due to malice, incompetence, or because they were replaced by aliens wearing their skins.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Very apt. Oddly enough I’ve only heard the phrase applied to The X-Files

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But Scully and Mulder never succeed and demonstrating paranormal phenomena to anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Can't blame Scully, pretty sure she gets amnesia on a weekly basis

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

capable of great emotional restraint, but also deeply empathetic and caring and ‘tender’ when the time is right

Then there's Beverly who wanted Worf to live as a cripple and would deny him both an honorable death and a chance at a normal life, all because she couldn't reconcile her views with those of a different culture. That episode still pisses me off to no end.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Put Gimli in retail and watch him pull out his battleaxe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This type of relationship is pretty common in war. You and the squad end up "in the shit" and now you have all crossed the boundaries of what civilians call "manliness". You are free, unimpeachable, the manliest thing, a real warrior, a soldier in battle. The things you do now define manliness, you are writing the rules. They can call you whatever, you will reply with the sort of laughter that silences fools.

People die around you. The sound of another man's voice becomes poetry to you. How much longer will you hear his voice? Who knows, tell him a shitty joke. Sit on his lap for a gag, do whatever. Drink in his presence, press his flesh against yours, be alive together, try to keep him in your memory, tomorrow we all may die. Has anybody seen those pictures of soldiers from the American Civil War all hanging out and mugging for the camera? Acting all "gay" with each other? That's what war does to men, sometimes, probably not that often, I fear.

Somebody online with a military background once remarked about the safest he's ever felt, including in civilian life, was when he was in some tent in a war zone with the rest of the platoon, everyone in their sleeping bags, crammed in the tent together like a litter of kittens in a box. Sure, they were in the death zone, for real, but he was warm and snug, surrounded by armed badasses who would come to his aid at once if anything nasty went down. He said he slept like a baby, that he's never felt that sense of security since, not even safe in bed as a civilian, later.

It means a lot to me that this book, TLOR, was pretty much written by the Great War. Tolkien went to that war, against his own will, compelled by shame campaigns, not even the law, in spite of his own convictions, and he did not have some safe posting at the base, no, he was at the Somme. He saw the worst of it, probably missed death by inches several times, saw mud and blood, was deafened and battered, only to survive at last, coming home as changed as Frodo.

He watched men charge into machine guns like mice into a blender, watched them die of trench foot and the stupid ways war kills you without even glory or honor to show for it, saw that sometimes courage is just hiding in your little hole and not screaming when the tanks roll over. He saw Mordor in person. No man's land.

Then he came home, and did he write some edgy darkness? No. He wrote this thing, this fantasy, with its message of hope that evil can be vanquished, and that men can be good, yes, even when they seem utterly lost to goodness. This is somehow the lesson that the War to End All Wars had taught him. He had nothing left to prove, so he made a pretty, frivolous thing, for children, but couldn't help it, he couldn't help making something bigger than that. He knew how intimate men become with each other under fire, and it ended up in the book.

That is the only thing he wanted to remember, that unexpected love when suffering and death are right on top of you. I wonder who Legolas was to him? Somebody young and beautiful, who deserved to live a thousand years, but didn't, probably. They shall not grow old.

We shouldn't need the machine guns coming at us to hug our friends, that's probably what he wanted the world to know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Beautifully written and thank you for providing this insight. I have not been to war so it can be easy to miss the nuances

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'll never forget the time I ran into an old friend of mine and I went to give him a hug and he awkwardly laughed and said uh, no, and shook my hand.

We're still very good friends and we send several texts to each other every week.

But it's a terrible feeling when you instinctively go to hug someone with zero sexual feelings and get instantly and reflexively rejected. I don't blame my friend. I blame our fucked up culture.

'Murica: where we love our guns more than we love our school children. Is it any wonder men can't hug here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

My goddamn dad does this to me. Like I made a conscious decision years ago to give him hugs because I felt like it was bullshit to not show him affection. After a few years he started intercepting me and now forces the handshake.

He also became radically conservative in that time...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know your friend, but I just don't like people touching me in general. I've had people get upset that I won't hug them, but my boundaries are valid and should be respected. Not everyone wants to hug.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand where you're coming from, and your boundaries should be respected. Which is why I did not make an issue out of it. Like I said, we're still very good friends. And when he waved me off I just laughed awkwardly back and went with it.

And...I know him really well. It isn't that he doesn't like being touched. He, like a lot of men in America, is super phobic about anything within 500 miles of "gay".

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

That phobia shit is ridiculous. My first roommate was an openly gay guy (I'm straight), and the number of questions I got about my living situation or discomfort some clowns had about coming over was absurd. I thought folks had gotten somewhat better about it by now, but I guess not. Sad to hear.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Paraphrased from the last thread I saw about this: Women always want these types of men from LotR, but they never want to be like women from LotR: Strong, gentle, soft and loyal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@ogmios @The_Picard_Maneuver women in LotR stab people, argue with their dads all day, and waffle about kingsfoil.

Which is the soft one?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most of them? Are you confusing "soft" for "weak?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Bro have you even seen a woman?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the problem here is that if you want emotionally available men you have to treat men better.

Good luck getting people to do that.

Look up Troy Hawke on Instagram and use his act as a guide.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You must be new here. This is a comment section. Others call it a thread. You use it to comment on things.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's cool. I've been here a while. Enjoy the incels.

The answer is "incels". You're talking to incels.

Enjoy the gratification online, but it's gross.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Different person. Next lesson we'll learn about usernames.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I'm talking to you numb nuts. Look ONE day back in my comments. My point was they were talking, and you are talking/ virtue signaling to incels. Continue to do so. It's a good red flag.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, and I'm talking to you. All I said was that I wasn't the same person you asked your original question to. "Who are you talking to?" Was not asked to me. I must not have taught you very well.

In comment sections and threads, anybody can jump into conversations. You can see that when I jumped in after you asked a question.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, the last time I tried to be tender and emotional like this my wife mocked me for crying. Do I wish for close relationships like this with my fellow men, yes but there's no room for it for some of us. Toxic masculinity is also expressed by the women in our society (USA)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Find a better human to be your wife.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I know that's an extreme comment but I couldn't imagine being with someone where I have to be guarded or keep walls up, that's really unhealthy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The fellowship, especially the human members were made up of aristocrats doing things for honor and Valor. But most humans in 4th age me were living in squalor, a shell of a former great empire and people. Even the movies did a decent job of showing the distrust, violence and squalor and curruptability of average men.

All that said yes show less toxicity and more role model responses to hard situations is a good idea. But drama sells.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Excuse me? Doing it for honor and valor?

They were doing it to save middle earth from a tyrant who would have enslaved everyone under his rule.

That was one of Tolkien's concepts, that a king should protect his people and lead by example. There is no battle in which Aragorn didn't lead from the front.

The 4th age was one of peace and prosperity. Please share the source for the peoples of middle earth living in squalor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

If a king can't protect and take care of his people then they are better off without him, that's what got heads rolling around Europe at a certain point

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well you definitely right about the motivation. I guess my thoughts were 1. all the elves could have just bailed on ME but some stuck around. 2. Aragon in the books always intended on being king and was further motivated by elronds requirement to marry his daughter so as much as he may have done it to lead from the front it was still a game of houses. 3. Overall you absolutely right about the forth being prosperous i had the industrialisation of bag end in mind in particular. Yes sams family fixes it over 3 generations and it was 1 town trading with sauromon, but it def was the exploitative example I thought of. 4.Other than the wizard and hobbits it was all nobility in the fellowship etc... last is the "height of humanity" were the early numenorians so what was left of civilization by the lotr saga anyway was diminished

Thanks for checking my generalization I should be more careful not to twist tokens intent

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No worries. I appreciate you coming back to reiterate and elaborate on your thoughts. And having a civil discourse on Tolkien.

I just want to add on some details about Aragorn for those coming to know more.

That whilst he did intend to reclaim the throne, the way he went about it was about as noble and selflessly as possible. He didn't do it by conquering or by force. He did it by proving he was worthy of being king. He rescued Gondor from certain destruction. He healed people " the hands of the king are the hands of a healer. " Then when he finally does reclaim it, he ruled in a way basically the opposite of the last millennium of rulership. And worked to undo a thousand years or more of gradual decay.

"Kings made tombs more splendid than the houses of the living and counted the names of their descent dearer than the names of their sons."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Beautifully said. And honestly I kind of forgot about this and its a major theme. I got prrtty hung up on magic leaving/dying and the fact there were still humans like the haradrim or Easterling. I think aaragon made peace with them? I really dont know how I managed to not weight his reign with more importance, guess it shows my own bias pessimism. He was basically the perfect archetype and all the symbolism of him planting the 4th tree, etc making him more a messiah than hungry for power. I didnt really think he purged humanity of sin though .. did he ever go so far to suggest that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah he was borderlining on messiah-ish but I think given Tolkien's distaste for allegories, he didn't want to make any character too messianic.

My reading of Aragorn is not of a messianic figure, but more of an example of what a true leader should strive towards. He left no one behind, " we will not abandon merry and pippin to torment and death." He knew when things were beyond him, parting ways with Frodo, knowing he would eventually be a risk to Frodo. Most of all, putting his kingship for the betterment of the people.

I think it resonates even louder for me now because of the current geo-political situation.