this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

News

22528 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge in Fort Worth, Texas, on Friday blocked a new Biden administration rule that would prohibit credit card companies from charging customers late fees higher than $8.

US District Judge Mark T. Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, granted a preliminary injunction to several business and banking organizations that allege the new rule violates several federal statutes.

These organizations, led by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, sued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after the rule was finalized in March. The rule, which was set to go into effect Tuesday, would save consumers about $10 billion per year by cutting fees from an average of $32, the CFPB estimated.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The next president needs to pack the Federal court benches. I am getting so tired of right wingnuts upending democracy with these BS rulings.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

This kind of stuff is absolutely the number one failure of Democrats. They want to play fair and by the rules, so when there's opposition to their appointments they just lie down and accept it until the Republicans get exactly who they want. Meanwhile the Republicans will lie, cheat, and slander their way to anything they want, including getting ultra-conservatives in on positions that aren't supposed to be political.

Biden's been way better in this regard which is part of what makes him way better than previous Democrat presidents. But I still don't have high hopes for "the party of compromise" in getting progressives in these kinds of positions. In particular, we all remember what happened at the end of Obama's presidency with supreme court judges and Roe v Wade.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Democrats use "fair and by the rules" as an excuse for failing at playing politics. It was clear what was going to happen. Nobody did anything except the Republicans who capitalized everything everywhere for a decade. Democrats and liberals are still unaware what happened

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You guys are missing an essential point — conservatives control the narrative.

  • From Fox News blowing MSNBC and CNN out of the water in ratings
  • Right-wing talk radio pioneered by Rush Limbaugh
  • Indoctrination Centers (churches) across America...

Conservatives LONG won the information war.

What does this mean? Republicans can do no wrong while Democrats are held to an infinitely higher standard and anything they do is hammered home to the ignorant, uneducated average American FAR greater than what Democrats can do to the right.

Things have marginally improved in the last 10 years as the recognition of Botherism has expanded, but let's not forget: (1) Republicans still have the majority of the money, (2) Republicans won huge with Citizens United and SpeechNow decisions, and (3) they're assholes and assholes will beat you with experience.

Catering to a broader coalition on the left that is also far less confrontational by the nature of being more empathetic is also something that we as a group must come to terms with. Our rallying points have never been blind loyalty and fear-mongering like the Right uses with the literally biochemically-altered conservative brain (studies on MRI testing prove this). We gather strength through vision, hope, solidarity, love — hence why Obama's Hope & Change message in 2008 was pure genius.

Though I will say I do agree there is a certain type of character we can seek to promote on the left, like AOC, like Bernie, like Warren, and like even Swalwell. Someone not afraid to push the bully back. Hopefully we learned a big lesson from Obama's era of capitulation and seeing his hand get smacked down over and over as he tried to reach across the aisle.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

My personal saying has always been: Democrats rule with incompetence. Republicans rule with spite and malice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Good ol’ Christian Right wanting a Christian Nation while defending banks and ignoring their Jesus who destroyed the money lenders’ tables.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It shocks me that people are still shocked that American Christians dont read the bible or have any idea whats in it.

Especially when they, as a group, spend damn near every waking moment violating mathrew 6:5-6:8

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The problem is you can interpret it however you want. It's very easy to justify defying almost any of Christ's teachings with some fun wordplay. Matthew 6:5-8 is about performative worship, and Christians don't do performative worship you see, they are actually worshiping so it doesn't count. Not sure how they weasel themselves out of Matthew 6:14-15 though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

They read the parts they want. They hear what they’re told to believe by their preachers. In the end it doesn’t matter, they just interpret it how they want and disregard the rest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

They probably see the wrong in the money lenders as simply doing their business in the temple, rather than the practice itself.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

OK... so this is weird. The Supreme court just upheld that the funding structure of the CFPB was constitutional overruling the 5th circuit ruling that the CFPB funding structure was unconstitutional... But THIS federal judge just used the 5th court unconstitutionality ruling as the basis for why this CFPB credit card rule was unconstitutional (the CFPB is unconstitutional so any decision they make is invalid). It seems like he's leaning on a just overturned ruling to make this decision. Is this just a case of a timing error where everything in the credit card fee case was filed before he Supreme Court overruled the 5th circuit's ruling or is there another argument there?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

It’s the 1% getting what they paid for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gotta love how it's always one asshole judge in Texas that can stop legislation for the whole country.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Infuriating thing was, this judge was clearly shopped for, but he kicked the case to the DC district Court instead of Texas. He himself even accused the banks of venue shopping in the ruling when he did so! Unfortunately the DC district court sent it right back and said he still had to take the case. He should have recused himself at that pont anyways given his stock holdings and things, but he now decides to reward the the banks for their venue shopping he's clearly aware of. Judiciary is rotten.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-judge-moves-fee-case-232103686.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (7 children)

He just put an injunction in place which is common. It just means the case has to be decided first.

If he’s accusing them of venue shopping. I suspect he’s going to rule against them.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Guillotines exist for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Enough Modern Aristocrats need to feel the heat and things would change

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I remember how frequent "legislating from the bench" came up on the news - Is the GOP up in arms about this one?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

"activist judges" was the term I remember, but only when right wingers were ~~projecting~~ complaining about liberal judges...

I hate this timeline so much. Lie lie lie lie lie and get their way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Idk if it's this one, but there's one Texas county they love ramming these things through because there's only one judge and he's a hardcore trumper.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wait, the Chamber of Commerce is conservative? Is that all of them?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

US Chamber of Commerce is a Conservative lobby group with a name meant to sound innocuous. Local CoCs run the gamut but are generally for small to mid businesses to network and collectively engage when the local government. Kinda like a union but for bosses.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Damn, that’s entirely right, it’s a union for the owner class.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's just a made up private company like the better business bureau. The try to seem official or related to government but it's just another company.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That makes sense. Thanks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

US District Judge Mark T. Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump

This is where we share reaping what we sowed with the long term secondary and tertiary damage from electing Donald Trump (and by extension, giving the Federalist Society carte blanche to re-form the judiciary in their hateful, spiteful image). They will continue to happen for decades to come (and will often be blamed on the liberals/progressive currently in power because they'll be the only ones trying to do anything to fix it).

The future's looking bright, guys

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Aren't those guys kinda anti-federalist, except where it benefits them?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I imagine this judge made a fat stack of cash if this. Even if you delay it a year, think of how much money the banks can make extra.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

... 10 billion. It says so in the summary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The judge was probably persuaded by 10k only

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It is surprisingly inexpensive to buy a US congressperson or a senator. So yeah, I'd bet less for a judge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The going rate is a vacation RV for a SCROTUS. A gift card to the olive garden might be enough for some judges.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But both sides! They're the same! Blah blah blah. Politicians are politicians, but the Republicans do absolutely nothing to actually better the lives of their voters. Republicans answer only to the pursuit of absolute power and their wealthy donors. End rant....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

And Democrats do nothing to stop them. 🤷

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (24 children)

I want stories like this bombarded at the morons on here saying Biden does nothing and both sides are the same.

This Trump fucker is actively fighting for mega corps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (31 children)

It doesn't matter to them. They think all they have to say is "Genocide Joe" and they've made their argument.

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Ah yes. Late fees. Something that clearly contributes to our society.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›