this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Per Trump, “great legal experts,” including Sean Hannity and Mark Levin, believed there was no case.

Today I was absolutely shocked to learn that Sean Hannity and Mark Levin are great legal experts.

And [the hush money jury] is in about a 95 percent Democrat area,

Pro tip: if you don't want to be tried by a jury from a mostly-Democratic area, don't commit crimes in New York City.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This dude lived most of his life on Manhattan. He has multiple properties there. Those people know him best and are the best judges of guilt in his trial.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Pro pro-trip. If you have something to hide don't run as president. If he just remained a private citizen this wouldn't be happening to him right now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Has someone tried starting a conspiracy that Donald Trump is fucking dead and this is a clone meant to trick people into voting for a Luciferian Sleeper Agent?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if Trump gets reelected, and H5N1 becomes a pandemic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I remember reading that there was a large percentage of Americans that considered the pandemic a "sign from god". Now I'm no statistician, but I feel like there's a large overlap between the people who thought that and the people who absolutely would not think it's a sign negatively related to Trump, and would somehow justify the second one as a warning about those damn deep state liberals.

Would be pretty hilarious though, if not for the innocent people who would suffer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There is a certain segment of society that thinks every natural event is a "sign from (their) god".

I do wonder how many of the same people that kept mindlessly repeating phrases like "gain of function! gain of function!" like good little parrots were ALSO saying the pandemic was a "sign from god", though.... 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Wonder about the natural world is nice, but I've definitely seen people take it too far. One comment on here talked about how they saw miracles every day. Like they were hungry and found $20 in their jacket pocket. Or they were cold and the sun came out.

That's not a miracle. It's just coincidence. You can't say that everything is meaningful or nothing is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but like that's going to stop him taking waaay too close to 50% of the vote to be comfortable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It’s not about 50% it’s about swing states and the illegitimate electoral college

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Glad that has an article I can share to my friends who are normally very intelligent, but they legit believe Biden stole the erection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Uh Trump was the one in office. Pretty damn hard rig an election when you're not in power or position to influence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Please define illegitimate electoral college.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

In 1929, Congress passed the Reapportionment Act, loving the House of Representatives at 435. Due to population growth in largely coastal states, and the requirement of at least one Representative per state, the House, which was intended to provide representation proportional to population, instead give a significant amount of power to states with lower population densities, resulting in a tendency towards minority rule in the House. Since the number of Electoral College votes are proportional to a state's delegation to Congress, this also gives low-population states an outsized influence over the Presidential election, contrary to the intent of the US Constitution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When is this waste of space gonna die?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

That's what I'm saying.