this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
78 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a collaborative effort, Apple and Google have developed an industry-standard detection feature called "Detecting Unwanted Location Trackers" (DULT) for Bluetooth trackers. This standard allows users on iOS and Android devices to be alerted if an unknown Bluetooth tracker is monitoring their location.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I wonder what it will be like on a long flight with this feature: there is an army of unknown Bluetooth items moving with you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

My sister has encountered that issue, when a kid on her school trip had an AirTag in his bag. Everyone’s phones rang

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully there’s a special case built in where it doesn’t do that if the original owner is still nearby?

I use AirTags when I’m traveling and would feel bad if mine set off 100 phones all at once.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

For airtags that was, at least until recently, the case. You could only detect "lost airtags".

Which makes sense, since only then they are relevant for stalking etc.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Phones are trackers in and of themselves. Just look back to the NSA controversy...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Regular people don’t have access to that data. They do have access to a $30 tracker, and people need to know if they’re being stalked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Aren't most of the data the NSA collects from third parties like Google and Apple who already sell that data? can't anybody theoretically buy that data if its being sold? much like the mobile US carrier's were doing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My gut tells me they only sell in bulk, you can't just request your ex girlfriends dataset

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I have always asked me when this would happen. So if I have a tracker on my bike the thief will now be notified of the situation.

Basically making a whole lot of potential use cases obsolete., or am I missing something?

I think the gain in privacy is definitely worth it. Just trying to understand if I am missing something

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I guess it helps against being stalked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I have always asked me when this would happen.

Well, what did you say?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This should be a TheOnion article 🤣

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I... partially agree? There's a bit of a difference between the targeted tracking a private individual does with an airtag, vs the generalized, but equally creepy tracking google/apple/others do through widespread tech. One definitely poses a greater short term risk than the other

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean on Android you can just use Aurora or NeoStore which make it extremely easy to identify all sorts of trackers, but then you realize most of Google's stuff falls into that...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

This is about trackers as in devices which can geolocate, such as Apple's airtags, not privacy-invading data collection in apps. Google obviously wouldn't care to address the latter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

So this essentially makes all the tag crap worthless.....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I prefer the term "admirer".