this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
187 points (99.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5053 readers
461 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article: archive.today ghostarchive.org web.archive.org

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“The stakes could not be higher,” companies said in an appeal that comes before the court on Thursday. “Over two dozen cases have been filed by various states and municipalities across the country seeking to impose untold damages on energy companies ... and attempting to assert control over the nation’s energy policies .... This court should put a stop to it.”

Like how California applies stricter emissions standards to automobiles such that manufacturers have to produce "California" cars to sell there (and by extension dragging the rest of the country into the future, kicking and screaming)? We've already done this.

Also, won't someone think of the poor, poor energy companies!?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago

"The stakes could not be higher" - yeah, we've got a planet to save. "Impose untold damages", well yes, the damages are untold, as the cases have not been adjudicated, yet. And the damages will be higher the longer it takes for humanity to stop stabbing it's collective self in the eye.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

But the CARB rules are specifically grandfathered in by the EPA, since they predated it, which also limits their scope. CA can't just make up its own rules outside of that scope, and no other state can make their own rules, (but are allowed to adopt the CA rules where they are stricter than federal.)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

Pathetic scum

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What about States rights they like to talk about so much?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You missed the "red" there before "states". its in like 2 pt font size though, happens a lot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Takes out magnifying glass to read fine print

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The constitution doesn't grant the government permission to regulate the environment.

-- SCROTUS, probably

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Check cleared, it's now case law. Carry on as usual.

– SCROTUS

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Rv delivered. Written into constitution now. -SCROTUM