this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
56 points (95.2% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

When being gay is criminalized, I will be at the forefront of calling for Thiel's prosecution because I am that petty.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Its a shame for Thiel, that insulation via wealth only goes so far. Once oppression has been codified into law, and most of the streets have been sterilized of "undesirables", the machine will drink its own juice and come for him, too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Its a shame for Thiel, that insulation via wealth only goes so far.

"You'll get yours in the end" is a prophecy liberals make endless, while plutocrats continue to ignore it without real consequence.

Once oppression has been codified into law

Laws Are For Little People. My man Elon Musk should be serving a thousand year consecutive life sentence for the endless string of SEC violations, financial frauds, drug abuses, and sexual assaults he's committed in the last five years alone. Donald Trump should be on death row. None of these assholes actually get prosecuted for any of this shit, precisely because they're insulated through their wealth and social connections.

JD Vance isn't going to try and throw his sugar daddy under the bus, particularly when Thiel's fortune is based around his enormous government contracts for mass surveillance via Palantir. It would be just shy of trying to pick a fight with Eric Prince (America's premiere international warlord for hire) or Gregory Hayes (CEO of Raytheon, the company that makes all the high performance missiles, rockets, and smart bombs).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure Ernst Röhm thought the same thing. Inevitably, the alliance of convenience runs its course and the fascists decide it's easier if they're dead.

Dead men can't hire lawyers to defend their stock portfolios, after all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I’m sure Ernst Röhm thought the same thing

If you need to go back 90 years to make a point, it might be a weak one.

Reagan had gay members of his administration while he joked about the AIDS epidemic.

Nixon had gay men in his administration, a fact he complained about on tape.

Hoover crossdressed as head of the FBI, and he was at the heart of a fascist white terror during the 1950s.

It's strongly believed that James Buchanan was in a relationship with Senator Rufus King, while President.

Reactionary attitudes towards sex did not seem to affect any of these economic elites.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Elites do fall they are often just replaced with new ones but its absolutely plausible the snake eats him

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

This is real life, anything could happen. The rich get fucked just as much as they get away. There will be no warning. Even for those like Thiel if Project 2025 was fully implemented. He would automatically be branded a pedophile and receive the death penalty. Don't think they wouldn't be quick to consume each other. The vacuum of power would be ripe for anyone remaining. We're getting to the point where the greedy must devour each other to grow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just keep in mind, there's a shit ton of republikkklowns that are closet gays. They just use it as more outrage because scared idiots eat it up and join the cult.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It doesnt matter. They'll march us off the cliff over coming out. Which is also a shame. I may have been depressed, but I have come to terms with who and what I am and can be content with it. I couldn't imagine rejecting yourself to such an extent. It has to cause serious mental harm.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Wealth allows mobility. He can flee to the EU or Canada easily.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

He's got a huge bug out property in New Zealand I think ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

or at the very least he will be spending so much on bribes to keep himself out of a prison that he'll eventually run out of cash.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Peter Thiel is also a neo-Nazi. Don't let his suit and tie and fancy degrees fool you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nazis, neo or otherwise, think of being gay as a mental illness. Being a billionaire might insulate Thiel from the face eating leopards, but only in so far as the leopards have other targets. Neo Nazis are going to clean up house of minorities and gays once they have sufficient legal foothold.

As for conservatives, they don’t care about how much money someone else has, but rather how much they can use someone else’s money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Being a billionaire might insulate Thiel from the face eating leopards, but only in so far as the leopards have other targets.

The Catholics might think they can preach against homosexuality, but eventually they're going to discover that their congregants won't put up with all the homosexuality in the priesthood. Maybe not today, but possibly within the next 1500 years. And then won't they fell bad about what they've done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, that’s kind of what’s happening now.

According to the studies, “self-identified homosexual orientation is notably more common among ordinations that occurred before the year 2000—between 11 and 15 percent—than it is after 2000 (2–3 percent),” he wrote. “The same is true of respondents’ selection of the category ‘somewhere in between, but more on the homosexual side,’ the response given by 7–9 percent of respondents with pre-2000 ordinations but only 3.2–3.5 percent of those more recently ordained.”

https://catholicvote.org/study-number-of-gay-priests-plunges/

There’s also growing support in some cases, but with mixed results

https://www.christianpost.com/news/1-million-member-regional-body-leaves-umc-over-lgbt-stance.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

As a billionaire, you're putting forward 99% of the world as targets first. His life isn't in any danger from them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're willing to tolerate gay people so long as they're racist...well for a while anyway. I mean Ernst Rohm was head of the SA (brown shirts) under Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Right and soon as they have a legal framework for dealing with the first undesirable, they’ll just move on to the next one

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He subscribes to a branch of neo-reactionary politics coined "dark enlightenment" that basically rejects liberalism. In short, these fine fellows believe that we should be their literal serfs in a neo-feudal society. I think point for point, their ideology is even more fucked up than fascism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Even serfs had to be treated halfways decently by their lords or they risked being overthrown or having no one left to work their land. With this capitalist dystopia we don't even get that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Priorities. Billionaire 1st, gay 2nd.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Because being gay when you have enough money and power stops being a factor. You’re insulated from the overwhelming majority of any social problems that affect normal lgbtq people.

So your decisions are going to be the same as most any others in the Uber-wealthy: you look to enhance your power and finances. Nothing else is your problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Simple. "Fuck you, got mine"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In another thread about Grindr going down during the RNC convention, the general opinion is that they are repressed homosexuals and that is why they are fascists. I think Pete hits on, and you sum up, the real reason: some rich gay people feel insulated by their wealth from the problems that republicans might introduce, and think adding even more wealth is the way to go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It isn't as though conservatives limit their derision to homosexuality. Any kind of sexual promiscuity is cause for condemnation and persecution if you're poor. This isn't homosexuality as taboo, this is sexuality as a luxury reserved for the wealthiest and most well-connected.

FFS, we've got video recordings of Donald Trump groping Rudy Giuliani in drag as part of a sketch comedy routine. Lauren Boebert gives handies out at the theater. JD Vance himself is married to a migrant of color. Vanishingly few conservatives seems to mind. This has always been a question of economic privilege, rather than some universal social taboo. Its a tool for Othering the political opposition, not policing the party leadership internally.

Wealth, along with the benefits of an obsequies mass media and mercenary police force, guarantee you can have all the Burning Man orgy tents you want just so long as you've paid off the right people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, they should ask Ernst Rohm how well that goes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is a mindset I am having a very hard time wrapping my head around. Why?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Think about it. Our entire western civilization revolves around how much money you have. Most billionaires are only concerned with accumulating more wealth, and historically Republican administrations are pretty good about supporting that (tax cuts for the wealthy, gutting of social programs to support those cuts, etc). They don't give two shits about the rest of the population, as long as their wealth increases.

Money is also power. The more power you have, the more you get away with. So even though someone like Thiel might be as gay as a rainbow, he's in that echelon of people who are quite rich and powerful that being gay doesn't matter, he has the money and power to sidestep the oppression his comrades seek. Their reason for the oppression of gays is the same as the oppression of any other marginalized group (LGBT+, women, POC, etc); it gives their supporters an enemy, which in turn galvanizes their base, and reinforces the party's power. People like Thiel aren't concerned with any of that because they have the resources and influence to sidestep that oppression.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Makes sense to me. While it's probably implied in Buttigieg's point, I'd like to add there's a level of contempt for the poor, and by poor I mean folks who are not wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Gay billionaire knows his people are the billionaires, not the gays.

Only the poors think about cultural conflict, the rich know we’ve got a class-based war a-raging, and the score’s not even close. The rich are the one’s stoking the cultural conflicts as a ruse to keep the onslaught on the poors out of sight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A lot of gay people are financially kind to people they have had sex with. I am not saying that's relevant in this situation.

There's another person who Theil "randomly" put a lot of money and clout behind too.

I guess it's possible it's not related to sex both times? But it seems really random if it's not related to sex.

Pete gave the kind safe answer.

Looks like both the big political parties offer people opprtunities to fuck their way up to the top.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Mr. Bean-egg-egg...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's steering away from the real connections between JD Vance, Peter Thiel and his connections to government infiltration, which includes democrats.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's plenty of Dems caught up in it, but the worst of the Silicon Valley scene supports the GOP.

Bilaji Srinivasan's Gray Pride pipe dream is based on using street paramilitaries to remove the (quite pro-capital) Democrats from power in the Bay area.

Now thankfully, he's too much of a fuckin' weirdo to bring a movement like that together, but the right wing already has groups like the Proud Boys and Patriot Front working on a similar political project.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Peter Thiel's Palantir which has its claws in every aspect of government is a larger danger when some white supremesists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Peter theil is only one person. One vote.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The people you need to be afraid of the most are your dick cheneys. Nameless dod contractors hiding behind layers of corporations that hide their identity.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Peter Thiel's Palantir is way more nefarious than Dick Chaney and Halliburton. his policies and acceptance into politics is full bipartisan.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

I found a lot of people like him who would say whatever they needed to, to get ahead

Including one in the mirror. And he said this on Real Smugness With Bill Maher.

Not that he's at all wrong about Vance. He isn't. He's just also an enormous hypocrite.