this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
77 points (97.5% liked)

News

22528 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WaPo gift article - no paywall

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Usha Vance, 38, addressed an overwhelmingly White crowd on the convention floor that tittered uneasily as she joked about her husband learning to cook Indian food and audibly gasped when she mentioned her vegetarian diet.

In case anyone didn't remember what color most snowflakes are 🤦😂

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Let's not forget what her husband thinks of her!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Wow. Every time I think I can't loathe that sad little man more, I learn something new he's done or said that proves me wrong 🤦

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Shes a damn sight prettier than he deserves

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

She can't be that great if she married that guy. In all likelihood she's also a far right nutbag, who's turn it is to have her face eaten by leopards

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Money....it's because of money...... money can get people things they don't deserve.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Hindutva love Trump's Republican party, right until they deport them for not being Christian. They've got a similar relationship there as zionists do.

I'm actually rather surprised the evangelicals aren't revolting over a Catholic/Hindu couple being on the ticket.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm actually rather surprised the evangelicals aren't revolting over a Catholic/Hindu couple being on the ticket.

Me too, but at the same time I'm not. I guess their inherently blasphemous worship of Trump is stronger than their bigotry.

Which is kinda ironic since his bigotry (and thus him validating their own) is one of the main reasons why these idiots consider him the savior of (white, Christian) mankind 🤦😄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s all good as long as them non whites “know their place”.

So if Vance just talks down about her, then their hierarchy is not threatened. That’s why he said what he did in this post.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess now we know what he thinks of Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There were good folks on both sides, pardner!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Just watched that golf dude on YouTube play rounds with trump. That pardner stuff was so cringe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yes but he didn't say it in a negative way. He said it in a performative way. When you have no beliefs or morals it's amazing the positions you can take consecutively.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Zero sympathy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

He makes everyone kiss the ring, and the gop is set up such that that's the normal power structure. If the voter base had any self awareness they'd see the weakness inherent in the platform

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like speaking out against Trump is a great way to get a job for him.

If you're willing to backpedal and support him for money and influence then he knows you are spineless and unprincipled. That means he knows exactly how to control you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's actually an old Stalinist tactic. Force your underlings to lie in obvious ways. You know they lied, the public knows they lied, they know the public knows. It's an act of obedience.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

That's all Repubs. IDK if there was plausible deniability for W, but there certainly was no plausible deniability for Donald. The only people voting Repub are appalling bigots, whether or not they are as self aware as Usha apparently is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bet she picks out extremely ugly furniture for their home.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

some say a little too nice

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vance sees kissing Trumps ass as the easiest way to be on the ticket for Fuhrer next election cycle. If Trump wins or loses he won't be in physical/mental shape for the next election and Vance sees sticking his nose intestine deep up Trump's ass and using the next 4 years as his sounding board to say whatever smoothbrained maga wants to get his name out there.

It's his Ace Ventura "put me in coach" moment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think this was Pence's play too. He just had a moment of clarity when we saw a glimpse of his future where the word "Pence" replaced "Benedict Arnold" as the default word for "traitor" and didn't want that to be his legacy. As much as I dislike Pence, I respect him for his moment of authenticity to certify the election in the face of fascism .

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It was…. Trump was going to lose and Pence run in 2020. There’s a video of his wife mouthing “I hope you’re happy” when the win was announced.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump chose pence because he was repugnant enough to ward off assassination attempts before we knew how bad trump was. Why did he choose Vance?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This line of thinking assumes Trump is capable of concocting elaborate schemes to hide his intentions. I don't think he's that intelligent and I don't think he tries to hide his intentions at all. He's exactly as dumb as he appears and his intentions are plain. His style only works because the people who support him are also idiots.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I honestly don’t think it requires much brain power to make sure your replacement is unpalatable, but okay

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It’s almost like they don’t really believe in anything except power…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Gift article but you need to give your email to read.

Email wall.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Her old man may have threatened to beat her

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Given the fact that he's a staunch believer that women should stay in violent marriages instead of divorcing, you may be right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Her father's involved in this now, too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. "Old man" is an old colloquialism for spouse

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Huh. When did that happen? Etymonline isn't helpful here. Maybe it's regional or something? Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The term has been around since the 40s and 50s. As too regional no it was/is nationwide. More likely cultural. The youth of those days were more accuztomex to it than their parents

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Must be regional or something else because I’ve never heard “old man” used in any other context than as a father. I’ve lived in Florida and the west coast and traveled all over the US for context.

“The ‘ol’ ball and chain” is used for spouse, unfortunately it’s usually used for women.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Guess you are just too young to have heard it since it began so long ago. Even been on television enough for most people to have heard it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m in my 40s, so it must be quite an old thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

At that age you should have heard it at least once in your life. Dunno maybe the 20 year difference between us is enough to prevent that kind of exposure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My old man
He's a singer in the park
He's a walker in the rain
He's a dancer in the dark
We don't need no piece of paper
From the city hall
Keeping us tied and true
No, my old man
Keeping away my blues