A: She's lying. B: Vote for her anyways; because the alternative is worse.
United States | News & Politics
A) Yep
B) No.
I mean, your non-vote for her is a vote for Trump, so I see who you'd really like in the whitehouse.
Voting for Kamala is directly voting for and endorsing the Genocide.
Not voting for Trump means voting for Kamala according to your logic so vote third party.
I mean, your non-vote for her is a vote for Trump
Not everyone responds well to having absurdities leveled at them.
I am voting third party, which means I am not voting for trump, therefore I am voting for harris. please send your thanks directly to my inbox at your earliest convenience.
Zeroth of all, unless you live in a swing state, your vote has no effect on the outcome whatsoever.
Not entirely true... even if the Electoral College to determine the President hinges on select swing states, there are many competitive state races for congresspeople, senators, governors, state government department positions. As a concrete example, Ohio is probably voting Trump, but in the Senate, the Democrat Brown appears slightly ahead over Republican Moreno.
Even if your presidential vote means nothing, if you are eligible to vote in the USA, you should still go and vote. Campaigns and pundits do look at the trendlines to see what states could possibly be in play for 2028 and 2032.
[…] there are many competitive state races for congresspeople, senators, governors, state government department positions.
Sure—I don’t think there’s anyone who doesn’t understand that the Electoral College is specific to the presidency.
Campaigns and pundits do look at the trendlines to see what states could possibly be in play for 2028 and 2032.
Which is why you should consider voting third party (or leave it blank) in non-swing states: to put pressure on the Democratic party to change its platform.