this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
5 points (77.8% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump will go complete fascist

Yes, as opposed to his super progressive stances he's had up until this point... He's always been a complete fascist, thankfully for us he was just too dumb to fully capitalize on it while in office.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Trump isn't a fascist. His supporters are. He just says whatever they want to hear 🤷‍♂️

Trump understood that, or at least his handlers and now he's milking the fuck outta 'em.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's not fascist, he just says fascist things and encourages his followers to act in fascist ways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Something something walks something talks something something duck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If it looks like shit and smells like shit ... It's definitely not roses

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"Trump isn't fascist he just says and does fascist things."

Seriously?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My man out here is really "well actually-ing" fascism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Okay, since you're already here: how does it feel to be the dumbest person I know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The Trump Administration is correctly aligned with Fascism. Several U.S. Presidents were also Fascist, the previous being the Reagan Administration.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How the hell was Johnson a communist?!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Leans that way based on policies and speeches.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wait, FDR is a left communist? He was a social democrat. There's a joke about how the New Deal saved capitalism. Who the fuck made this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're using the ol' Political Cumpiss Memes plot chart.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

PCM was 100% idiots and fascists. It would make a lot of sense that they'd create something so dumb.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He wasn't even really a social democrat, to be honest. He bowed to the pressure of the socialist party at the time to prevent an actual fucking revolution (even if it would have been unsuccessful). Fdr understood that actual socialism would come knocking at the door if he didn't capitulate. Clearly the best president we've had (in economic terms) in the mostly modern era, but he wasn't as progress as people believe.

Edit

Also, tf is a "left" communist in this context? That's not generally a term used, and when it is, it's normally to point out the distinction between anarchists and Marxists, as in Lenin's "left-wing communism."

Is this chart claiming FDR was an anarcho-communist? Because... No. LMAO

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fdr understood that actual socialism would come knocking at the door if he didn't capitulate.

Sounds like a textbook social democrat to me. Recognizing that social programs were necessary to prevent unrest is a likely reason that people from a wealthy political dynasty would support them. It's why both Roosevelts were so successful. They had their fingers on America's pulse and appealed to the white working class. They appealed on one hand, to their economic frustrations, breaking up monopolies and funding programs that helped people in desperate need. On the other hand, they appealed to nationalism and bigotry with Teddy's imperialism and FDR's alienation of ethnic groups like Japanese and Mexican American citizens.

The Democrats right now can't really use the same strategy, as they have a diverse coalition that wouldn't be down with that internal bigotry, while the white working class have embraced fascism because bigotry has been such a big part of their culture. The Democratic base is made of people who reject bigotry. That's the key value they all share. They are certainly more left wing economically than Republicans, but there are plenty of neoliberal Democrats that contribute big campaign dollars and reliable votes who the Dems don't want to alienate.

These Democrats are selfish pricks that want to keep their privilege, but not descend into fascism. Maybe it's because they're a minority that'll lose their privilege under fascism. Maybe they recognize that fascism is volatile and bad for long term business. Whatever the case, they aren't willing to give up their privilege to make a better world.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are looking at the lean, a social democrat would show a lean toward communism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's like saying oranges are basically apples. They aren't even claiming to strive for communism. Unlike democratic socialists who want to achieve a state of communism, social democracy is the end goal. The end goal is to have the government clean up where capitalism fails, but still keep capitalism and private property around. You could make the argument that all socialists are communists, but social democrats fundamentally aren't. It shows that you have no idea what communism is. Communism is not "government does stuff." It's an unrealized political ideal that is not about the state dominating everything. In fact, plenty of communists are anti-state.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand what a political leanings is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A system for understanding political leanings that classifies anti-communist southerners like LBJ as left communists is not an accurate one. Leanings like right or left are general enough to make sense, but terms like communist or liberal are more definitive ideologies. Whoever made this list either has no actual expertise in politics or is trying to push some sort of agenda. There has never been a socialist president, let alone a communist one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm aware, you should send that to Puppy as they seem to be the one who's confused. Why'd you reply to me with that?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh no, I'm not confused. I'm serious. You're the only one confused here.

Trump isn't a fascist. He's a fucking idiot.

You seem to think he is a mastermind with a superplan.

Laughable. He's a fucking moron that doesn't stand for anything beside money. If the easier side to manipulate were liberals, he would be a full blown out socialist.

The guy is leading the flock of sheep that drive in the most money. End of the story. Stop pretending he even knows and understand what hes saying.

Holy shit you are blind if you think Trump is a genius

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You seem to think he is a mastermind with a superplan.

Holy shit you are blind if you think Trump is a genius

Where the hell are you getting this idea from? Why are you implying that in order for him to be a fascist he has to be a genius with a super plan? Did you miss my initial comment you replied to saying he was too dumb? Most fascists are in fact, quite dumb. That's typically how they end up being fascists. He's a fucking moron, who happens to be a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You can be both a fascist and an idiot. The two do not oppose one another.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trump is the 45th president. How do you make a list like this and ignore the only black president you ever had.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just confused about the order.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You might want to re-read that table.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I disagree. You seem to suggest he is a mastermind and has a plan.

He doesn't. He's an idiot. He just say to whichever side is the easiest side to convince whatever they want to hear and they'll go with it.

If that make him a fascist, for you, so be it. I don't care I'm not here to defend Trump, of all the people lol.

I just disagree that he stand for anything. He's an idiot manipulated by bigger fish like Putin and whoever he own money to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who says fascists need to believe what they say?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Or that they need to be smart?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fascism is not a coherent ideology. So the fact Trump says/does incoherent shit to maintain his power is actually evidence that he may be a fascist rather than evidence against it. This guy has no idea what he’s talking about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He's not not a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Are you defending trump or gatekeeping fascism?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He's literally pro-dictatorship. Loves the way North Korea is ruled: with absolute authority and with harsh punishments for anyone who disobeys their ruler.

The man is furious that his presidency did not grant him that. If he is elected a second time, he will aim towards dismantling democracy for his own gain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well... sort of.

Trump never has held and never will hold any coherent political views of any sort. His entire focus is on himself, and the rest of the world only matters to the degree that he might manipulate people and things to feed his own ego, greed and lust.

So what'll likely actually happen is that his mindless supporters will rage, the psychopaths who want the world that having him in power will bring will fan the flames of that rage while whispering in his ear, and yes - he'll go full fascist. But not because of anything to do with fascism specifically - I doubt he can even grasp the broadest concept of it. It's simply that that will be, and to some notable degree will be contrived into being, the thing that he will believe will lead him to what he really wants - simply to feed his bottomless ego, greed and lust.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He understands fascism instinctively, not in an intellectual sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fascism is a lot like a government run by a toddler: Everyone who doesn't like me is bad and I should kill them. Also people who are weird are bad and we should kill them. And that land over there is mine so I'm gonna take it. All the while I'm going to complain about how I'm the real victim.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He does hold coherent political views. If political views are those having to do with the allocation of resources, then you outlined them yourself. He wants to further his own ego, greed, and lust. He thinks the government should exist to fulfill his every desire, and that all resources should go towards fulfilling them. He's the ultimate embodiment of corruption, with no guiding philosophy beyond selfishness. That is political, because wanting the world to bend to one's own will through the use of government is political. It's a kind of God-Emperor political philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If Trump is representing the GOP, Biden wins with 80% of the vote and the Democrats end up with a near super-majority in the House and Senate. More than enough to impeach and remove members of the Supreme Court.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. And obviously Hillary would landslide this buffoon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think you left out the part where Democrats grow spines.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you seriously here asking for money? That page looks like it was set up by someone who learned web development by taking a YouTube video course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the unpaywalled version of the page viewed through a proxy.. Sorry it has that big ad there, but it's better than the alternative of not seeing the content.